Posted on 11/26/2016 9:56:26 AM PST by zeestephen
An attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign says it will participate in the Wisconsin recount initiated by Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Well, imagine that!
Cat is out of the bag.
I slapped my knees in laughter hearing liberals say it was all about ensuring electoral integrity.
Now we know its really about trying to subvert the election.
These grifters need be prosecuted for the full extent. Nothing but a pile of crap the whole family and party.
it matters not who the people vote for. what matters is who counts and recounts the votes
Further down the statement, Hillary’s lawyer admits they uncovered zero evidence of hacking/vote fraud.
But we’ll still have a recount. Go figure.
Looks like it will be game back on for investigating the Beast.
Does anyone think they will change the election? How close were these states? What happened to the ballots? My how liberals like Al Gore and Hillary Clinton don’t want to accept the count.
We must remember that foreign governments gave millions to the Clintons and they WANT her in the white house. We also know there are many democrat office holders who are scared to death of the Clintons. They WANT her in the white house. I hope Trump doesn’t take this lightly.
I also ask all of you: What will you do if the election is overturned and given to Hillary? And you might should be careful how you word your answer. The NSA still answers to the tyrant.
Only a month ago, Hillary insisted that refusing to accept the election results “threatens democracy,” and all the DNC Media outlets loudly agreed.
Of course that was then. This is now.
Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.
They are just trying to provide more “end times” chaos to the mix.
They’d be foolish not to “participate” in the recount. Clinton was a candidate, wasn’t she? This is the same reason why Trump’s campaign team will be participating as well. LOL.
Did Jill Stein think she was cheated out of some votes? They ought to just recount her votes.
But well still have a recount. Go figure.
Elias is basically saying that while they didn't support a recount, if one is going to take place as an official state sanctioned activity, they want to be there. I would expect as much.
Trump needs to have his people there as well.
Everytime the media talks us into peace gestures, they Pearl Harbor us with endless Sorros sht like this
This is BS. We lose the rhetorical game if we do not stand up to their hypocrist
They meant that was only true if Trump won. /s
If the election is overturned, that would of course be horrible. However, not all would be lost. We now know that millions of other Americans feel just as we do about the big topics of our time. I have gone through this hypothetical exercise many times in my mind already. If the worst case scenario should occur, we have learned much about how to campaign.
We have learned much about what and who should be ignored, what and who should be given our attention or our money. Nothing can compare to The Donald, or the spectacular novelty of this moment in political history, but we could succeed again. This I now know.
I honestly don't think Hillary wants any part of this. She's already trying her her new "too old and feeble for prison" persona. She wants to retire quietly in Chappaqua.
This is Jill Stein's doing. She saw an opportunity for a cash grab from heartbroken, despondent voters and jumped on it, breaking Green Party records in fundraising.
Sure, she'll toss a couple million at futile recount efforts that might net Hillary a few hundred votes. The rest, no less than three million, will find its way into Green Party bank accounts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.