Posted on 11/25/2016 8:39:23 AM PST by dirtboy
Conventional wisdom tells us that the electoral college requires that the person who lost the popular vote this year must nonetheless become our president. That view is an insult to our framers. It is compelled by nothing in our Constitution. It should be rejected by anyone with any understanding of our democratic traditions — most important, the electors themselves.
The framers believed, as Alexander Hamilton put it, that “the sense of the people should operate in the choice of the [president].” But no nation had ever tried that idea before. So the framers created a safety valve on the people’s choice. Like a judge reviewing a jury verdict, where the people voted, the electoral college was intended to confirm — or not — the people’s choice. Electors were to apply, in Hamilton’s words, “a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice” — and then decide. The Constitution says nothing about “winner take all.” It says nothing to suggest that electors’ freedom should be constrained in any way. Instead, their wisdom — about whether to overrule “the people” or not — was to be free of political control yet guided by democratic values. They were to be citizens exercising judgment, not cogs turning a wheel.
Many think we should abolish the electoral college... What if the people elect a Manchurian candidate? Or a child rapist? What if evidence of massive fraud pervades a close election? It is a useful thing to have a body confirm the results of a democratic election — so long as that body exercises its power reflectively and conservatively. Rarely — if ever — should it veto the people’s choice. And if it does, it needs a very good reason.
(Excerpt) Read more at kenm77.newsvine.com ...
WaPo advocating for civil war
Subtract out 2 or 3 million illegal aliens
>>What if the people elect a Manchurian candidate?
Like Obama?
>>Or a child rapist?
Like Bill Clinton?
>>What if evidence of massive fraud pervades a close election?
Like Obama and the would-be tyrant Hillary?
Their desperation is now well into uncharted territory. I’m sure they will keep digging until the smog from Beijing will be the only thing that will make them take pause.
One simply needs to ask the question, If the roles were reversed, would the media write these same hand wringing articles? Of course not. Therefore, their arguments (and whining) are invalid.
Electors DO vote based on the popular vote.....OF THEIR STATE!
The list is growing.
She’s not the “peoples choice”, typical WPost lies. She didn’t get a majority of the vote, her entire popular vote margin came from one State - California, and that state has almost no protections against illegal aliens voting. Without California and its illegal voters and votes, Trump would have won the popular vote by 3 million.
Indeed.
The whole idea of the Electoral College was to guard against a number of things, including more populous states becoming tyrants, ballot-box stuffing, Election Fraud, and mob rule.
Our Founding Fathers were brilliant.
The Constitution also doesn't even require a president to be formally nominated by a political party ... or to even be an announced candidate at all.
The electors should just choose Ivanka Trump as president and be done with it.
Then the people will have elected a DemocRAT, in which case, you will be perfectly fine with it.
Dear lefties.
Presidential contests are decided by the popular vote, on a state by state basis. I’m sorry you do not fathom the distinction.
Carry on.
Wapo drivel. They are doubling down on the way to extinction.
She won the popular vote by 1.7 million. It is my belief that three to five million ballots were cast by illegal aliens. We won’t even talk about the bogus stolen ballots or those cast by people who voted multiple times in multiple states. It appears to me that Trump easily won the popular vote also. But, if you commie RATS insist on having a civil war in this country, “Say when.” Americans are fed up with your commie antics and we’re not going to back down anymore.
We did. Twice, in 2008 and 2012.
I will go along with this idiot when every American that votes shows absolute truthful proof of American citizenship, valid home address, with a valid ID, three copies of different home address bills, and swears that they are not voting illegally!!! Otherwise...shut your mouth and, go back into the hole you crawled out from. You must take all of us peons American citizens for being, the same buffoon that you are, idiot!!!
Better yet, what if the people elect a woman who defended a child rapist by arguing that the child fantasized about having sex with grown men?
Yeahhhhh, huh? Not a peep, right?
“Our Founding Fathers were brilliant.”
Sure, our founding fathers were smart and all, but Lawrence Lessig is a Harvard Law School Professor! He’s got to be smarter than those racist, outdated 18th century white guys.
/s
This is not going o end well. They will beat this, and beat it, and beat it, and I am nearly willing to bet it will turn violent. Lucky for us they have FAR fewer guns, because history shows in all likelihood, we may have to give them the war they want and shoot a few million of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.