Posted on 11/17/2016 10:10:25 AM PST by Kaslin
“Clinton's loss at the hands of Donald Trump amounted to the most surprising outcome in the history of modern electoral politics.” So writes David Catanese for usnews.com (11/11/16).
Many of the pollsters proved to be wrong after all. To his credit, Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia cried mea culpa, declaring: “We were wrong, ok? The entire punditry industry. The entire polling industry. The entire analyst industry. And I want to take this opportunity to take my fair share of the blame. We were wrong.”
“Success,” noted John F. Kennedy after he took responsibility for the fiasco that was the Bay of Pigs, “has many fathers, but failure is an orphan.” Trump’s surprising victory is ultimately his.
But what factors could have led the pollsters and punditry class so off base? I think a case can be made that abortion was very much on the ballot---and along those lines, since abortion was imposed on the American people by judicial fiat, the future of the Supreme Court was also key.
At the outset, if anybody accuses me of being a one-issue voter, and that issue is pro-life, then I plead guilty. That issue reveals so many other aspects of where a politician stands.
I feel if politicians can’t get this issue right, what else can’t they get right? It’s so basic---especially in this day when sonograms improve all the time and document the humanity of the unborn. Yet the ruling elites treat abortion like a sacred rite and right.
I believe God has blessed America through the years. I also believe with Thomas Jefferson’s view, when he said in another context, “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.” How can God continue to bless us when we have now killed up to 60 million of preborn children since Roe v. Wade?
But, of course, abortion has many supporters. Writing for Gallup (5/29/15), Lydia Saad noted. “Americans divide 50% ‘pro-choice,’ 44% ‘pro-life’ on abortion….This is the first time since 2008 that the pro-choice position has had a statistically significant lead in Americans' abortion views.” Yet, voting-wise, it didn’t work out that way last Tuesday.
Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood wanted to repeal the Hyde Amendment---the 1976 measure named after the late, pro-life Illinois Congressman, Henry Hyde---which denies federal funding for abortions. Some pro-lifers estimate that at least two million babies have been saved by that measure.
I once interviewed Henry Hyde for TV. He said, “There is no constitutional justification for Roe v. Wade.No one had ever seen a right of privacy or whatever other distortion the Court found to justify its decision for 200 years.”
The platforms of the two major political parties this year were diametrically opposed to each other on this issue of life. And this issue played a key role in terms of what types of judges would be appointed and approved.
After the election, I asked Bill Federer on my radio show, “What role did Christian conservatives play in the outcome?” He said, “I think it was crucial. Several different groups were trying to educate pastors.”
One of those is Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council in Washington D.C. Perkins, “served as a platform delegate from Louisiana.” He sent out a release after the election, noting the importance of the platform and the actual votes: "The Republican Party's platform positions on unborn human life and religious liberty was the bridge between Donald Trump and Christian conservatives.”
Perkins added, “Nearly 60 percent of Trump voters were more likely to vote for him because the platform is very clear on life and religious liberty. It was the party platform that brokered the deal between Trump and Christian conservatives -- a deal that was sealed in the final debate when Trump vividly described a partial-birth abortion and pledged to appoint pro-life justices.”
And Perkins noted, “…if there's one overwhelming message everyone should have heard on Tuesday, it's this: the media, the courts, and the Left don't speak for the American people.”
Eric J. Scheidler, Executive Director of the Pro-Life Action League, sent out a post-election statement: “Voters rejected Hillary Clinton's radical support for tax-payer funded abortion. Now it's time to withdraw all our tax dollars from Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion chain. This will be our number one priority in the first 100 days of the Trump administration.”
I’m reminded of how, after the conservative victories of the 2010 midterm elections, Ralph Reed of the Faith & Freedom Coalition declared: “…those who ignore or disregard social conservative voters and their issues do so at their own peril.”
Anybody who thought the religious right was dead in this country should think again in light of last week’s election.
Less we forget ..
“Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton argued. “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”
Hillary Clinton: Make Christians Change Their Religious Views to Support Abortion
Catholic ping!
Sabato did not make a mistake. He intentionally cooked the results, in my opinion, in order to sway opinion and voters in her direction. A “mea culpa” is not enough.
Harakiri would nice.
To hold such a belief and to impose it on fellow citizens betrays the "Declarations" of the document of our liberties--The Declaration of Independence
Her strong assertions in the final debate on this subject was the final straw for many voters who agree with the Author of that Declaration, Thomas Jefferson, that, "The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God."
Now, if, as Mrs. Clinton sees it, this Constitutional limit does not conform to her view, then perhaps this election may have reinforced for her the reality that the Declaration and United States Constitution exist, as Lincoln (as quoted here) said in his letter to Pierce:
"All honor to Jefferson--to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression." - Abraham Lincoln, Letter to Pierce
Very well said.
Thank you, NYer, for reminding us of this most arrogant statement which reminds us that dishonesty, arrogance and a will to impose coercive power to require "changing" another human being's "religious beliefs" is in direct conflict with every document of our liberty as a nation!
For later
Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood wanted to repeal the Hyde Amendment-—the 1976 measure named after the late, pro-life Illinois Congressman, Henry Hyde-—which denies federal funding for abortions. Some pro-lifers estimate that at least two million babies have been saved by that measure.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Those 2 million babies would be around 40 years old now-at least some of them.
How many voted for Hillary and didn’thave a clue?
Interesting question. “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”
Pretty much every election comes down to the turnout between The Christian Right and The anti-Christ Left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.