Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USC Dornsife/LA Times Poll: 11/05 -- Trump + 1.1 , Clinton - .8
USC/LA Times ^ | November 5, 2016 | USC/LA Times

Posted on 11/05/2016 12:10:57 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: changeitback440
somebody post the chart!

Yeah, I'd like to see it too.

I don't know how, or I'd post it myself

61 posted on 11/05/2016 1:35:02 AM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Could you post the chart for today? Thanks!


62 posted on 11/05/2016 1:41:55 AM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

And Dornsife oscillates back our way. 5.4 spread again and 48 percent. Awesome!


63 posted on 11/05/2016 1:50:26 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

>What is the percent chance that

Yes? That is not 0-100?

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-poll-faq-20161006-snap-story.html

How is the Daybreak poll different from other surveys?

The poll asks a different question than other surveys. Most polls ask people which candidate they support and, if they are undecided, whether there is a candidate they lean to. The Daybreak poll asks people to estimate, on a scale of 0 to 100, how likely they are to vote for each of the two major candidates or for some other candidate. Those estimates are then put together to produce a daily forecast.


64 posted on 11/05/2016 2:20:32 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; Steely Tom

#64 Plagiarized version above


65 posted on 11/05/2016 2:35:04 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

I believe this will show that Trump will now take over for good over the next 4 days. His “stock” should move 50-51 while the Beast will settle in around 40. Also if there is more bleeding from the no-voters, I think Trump could move as high as 52 by Tues..

Trump has gone thru the upper band 5 times
The Beast has not gone gone thru the upper band once

Trump has never gone thru the lower band
The Beast has gone thru the lower band 5 times

Like Bollinger Bands if the stock(Trump) goes thru the upper then retraces back to line and then moves higher, this is called testing the support and more often than not, means a move much higher.

The reverse is true for the other stock(Clinton) and she should move lower.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollinger_Bands


66 posted on 11/05/2016 2:35:08 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Thanks for the story. You are correct, I was mistaken.


67 posted on 11/05/2016 2:57:28 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
Appears Pat Cadell’s prediction that this race might mirror 1980 is coming to pass. Cadell said that his internal polling for Jimmy Carter had the race tied the Friday before the election, then he said by Sunday Reagan had jumped to a five point lead as undecided broke his way and went on to win by 10 points
68 posted on 11/05/2016 3:02:22 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

If I read the internals right, they still have a D plus 7 sample. I think? So this may be an even better harbinger than we think.
++++
I have looked and failed to find the D/R/I for this poll. Where did you find the D+7?


69 posted on 11/05/2016 3:12:51 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Has this 0-100 procedure been tested for accuracy in its predictions? Anyway, I like the trend. May it continue.


70 posted on 11/05/2016 3:19:20 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

We do indeed need to be thankful to God for Mr Trump. I am grateful beyond words that he was willing to leave his comfortable life and step into this crushing role to save America. I am humbled watching this unfold.


71 posted on 11/05/2016 3:23:58 AM PDT by lovesdogs (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

” It does not include data from the people who are rigging the election.”

LMAO!!! No poll does that. Also, no poll shows how many people who haven’t voted in years or decades are voting this cycle.

Vote Trump 2016


72 posted on 11/05/2016 3:28:07 AM PDT by TheStickman (Trump will be the 1st Pro America president since Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
RE: "...rigging the election..."

ST, you have no idea how bad this election process looks to conservatives who are observing from outside the country.

There is no other western democracy that allows non citizens anywhere near a ballot box. There is no other western democracy that has a registration process that is so vulnerable to fraud. There is no other western democracy that allows voting without legitimate photo ID. Until these basic vulnerabilities are rectified, you will not have a fair election.

73 posted on 11/05/2016 3:53:12 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Gold and Silver are real money. Everything else is a derivative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

India’s answer ti Rebel Wilson?


74 posted on 11/05/2016 3:54:53 AM PDT by Preston Manning (When standing on the edge of a cliff, a "giant step forward" is NOT progress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: djpg

Just guessing that USC tested it somewhere before using it in the presidential race and getting the LA Times to put their newspaper behind it? Maybe somebody’s doctorate is depending on it? Just guessing.


75 posted on 11/05/2016 3:57:37 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
I'm skeptical of a poll showing such a wide margin but even if the only fully accurate thing about this poll is the trend it depicts I'll take it...gladly.
76 posted on 11/05/2016 4:01:45 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Deplorables; All
Good Morning Everyone

Support Free Republic Here

77 posted on 11/05/2016 4:06:15 AM PDT by MEG33 (VOTE***TRUMP***Help Save Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

LOVE IT!


78 posted on 11/05/2016 4:07:04 AM PDT by MEG33 (VOTE***TRUMP***Help Save Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

The Big Don got it goin on!!

Wooooo!!!


79 posted on 11/05/2016 4:18:44 AM PDT by Bruiser78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Don’t be deterred if weekend and early week polls show a fall for Trump - they usually do.

If they don’t - then hotdog!


80 posted on 11/05/2016 4:22:55 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson