If she's breathing, she's lying.
Posted on 11/04/2016 7:04:45 AM PDT by SJackson
The 2016 elections are in the final stretch and were shaken to the core by the latest revelations from FBI Director James Comey on Friday, October 28, 2016 as reported by NBC News on October 30th, “FBI Obtains Warrant for Newly Discovered Emails in Clinton Probe — as Reid Accuses Comey of Hatch Act Violation.” Once again the Clinton scandal is creating turmoil in a presidential election that has gone way beyond “unconventional.” Indeed, Tom Clancy could not have scripted this year's presidential election and intrigues.
While Comey's recent remarks regarding the Clinton investigation have been extremely vague, the issue to focus on is how Hillary's use of a private computer server, private e-mail account and non-secure digital devices to store, send and receive classified materials may have drawn others into her tangled web of deception.
The current focus of the Clinton quagmire is on whether or not the laptop computer shared by Weiner and his estranged wife contains sensitive information. If that laptop had been hacked both Weiner and Abedin could have been vulnerable to blackmail. This was an issue raised by Congressman Louie Gohmert, Texan Republican and former judge in a Fox News Business interview on October 31, 2016 in a segment that was posted under the title, “Rep. Gohmert: Clinton is a potential victim of blackmail.”
Additional individuals may also have been drawn into this web of deception through these e-mails as well. A chain is as strong as its weakest link. The weak links begin with Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin and may now include Anthony Weiner and perhaps others. Meanwhile, there is no way to yet determine how many other weak links are “out there” petrified that WikiLeaks or perhaps, a hacker may yet disclose their improper dealings with the Clintons or their foundation.
Could not these additional individuals be subject to blackmail as well?
Let's take a moment to understand how all of this began.
Just months earlier Hillary Clinton had been let off the hook by an FBI Director who, in his official statement on July 5, 2016, included this excerpt:
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
By Comey's own words, anyone else might have had their security clearance lifted permanently. This raises the issue about such an individual demonstrating fitness for duty as president and raises the question as to why Comey did not see fit to take comparable action with Ms Clinton.
Comey's ultimate decision to not present the case to a Grand Jury was frustrating to those who have had security clearances and fully understand just how profound an impact these transgressions might have on national security.
However, perhaps Comey's hard to comprehend decision can be traced to a meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch less than one week before the FBI Director conducted that press conference. On June 29, 2015 ABC News-15 reported, “US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report.”
That article served as a predication for my article, “Loretta Lynch's Private Meeting With Bill Clinton Prior to Release of Benghazi Report: Why would the Attorney General, who sets the tone for law enforcement, do this?”
As Attorney General, Lynch is FBI Director Comey's boss.
At the time of this meeting the Justice Department was not only investigating Hillary's illegal use of a private e-mail server, non-secure personal digital devices but was also, conducting an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
In fact, on October 30, 2016 Breitbart reported, “Clinton Foundation FBI Investigation Confirmed By Former Assistant FBI Director.” Therefore Bill Clinton, was likely the target of an ongoing criminal investigation yet he had a totally inappropriate private meeting with the Attorney General to supposedly discuss golfing and grandchildren.
However, just days after that meeting, news organizations reported that Hillary was contemplating keeping Lynch on as Attorney General if she won the election.
On July 4, 2016 Newsmax reported, “NY Times: Clinton Weighs Keeping Lynch as Attorney General if She Wins.” Hillary's statement that she might keep Lynch on as Attorney General could have provided the incentive for Lynch to “Go along to get along.”
Indeed, Lynch did precisely that during her confirmation hearing as I described in my commentary, “Loretta Lynch: Same as the Old Boss: The Attorney General nominee's disturbing views on U.S. immigration law.”
My article included an excerpt from a Yahoo/AP news report, "Attorney General nominee defends Obama immigration changes." Here is the exchange in which Lynch discussed the administration's immigration's policies:
Lynch said she had no involvement in drafting the measures but called them "a reasonable way to marshal limited resources to deal with the problem" of illegal immigration. She said the Homeland Security Department was focusing on removals of "the most dangerous of the undocumented immigrants among us."
Pressed by Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, a leading immigration hard-liner, she said citizenship was not a right for people in the country illegally but rather a privilege that must be earned. However, when Sessions asked whether individuals in the country legally or those who are here unlawfully have more of a right to a job, Lynch replied, "The right and the obligation to work is one that's shared by everyone in this country regardless of how they came here."
Sessions quickly issued a news release to highlight that response. Under later questioning by Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, Lynch clarified it, stating there is no right to work for an immigrant who has no lawful status.
This was disturbing and telling, clearly Ms Lynch's views on immigration and likely, therefore on other issues are malleable and subject to revision if modifying her position is consistent with her personal goals.
As Attorney General Lynch directs the operations of the entire Justice Department and all those who work for that department. Ms. Lynch must understand true democracy can only exist when justice is blind and totally objective.
However, Lynch and the others who have fallen under Hillary Clinton's corrupt sphere of influence are trapped in Hillary's web of deception, having fallen victim to the Hillary Virus. Throughout Clinton's many decades in American politics, this highly contagious and virulent malady has proven to be virtually ineradicable. It is not likely to change no matter the outcome of the next election.
If Obama was sending messages to Hillary Clinton through her private server, and this server was hacked by foreign actors, then there is a very real possibility that the President of the United States was guilty of violating the Espionage Act.
Anthony and Huma are in deep doodoo and have a young son to think about. I think they are both up for prison sentences and may "sing" for the children, their child.
He would have needed a main character named "Jack Reacharound." LOL.
If she's breathing, she's lying.
I don’t believe there is a point at which any of this will matter. Through election or pardons, I think the Clintons will beat justice once again.
The bigger story here will be how the country's leadership deals with this after these clowns disappear from the scene -- and with every passing day I'm getting more convinced that a Trump victory is seen even by long-time Beltway insiders (Democrat and Republican alike) as an absolutely necessary first step.
A major concern these people have is that more and more Americans will just walk away from any form of public engagement, and will be content to live in an environment that is one step above complete anarchy.
There was a story posted here earlier this week about a development in California that should be seen as the biggest story of this election season. It involved a move by the government of California to seek a blanket exemption from one particular ObamaCare provision that prohibits illegal aliens from buying insurance on an ObamaCare exchange.
This is an unbelievable turn of events, when you dig into the details of the story. California isn't asking the U.S. government for permission to have illegal aliens covered under taxpayer-funded programs. They've already been doing that for years. California is asking for permission to let illegal aliens buy insurance through an ObamaCare exchange. This tells me that they are so desperate to get new enrollees signed up because more and more U.S. citizens are just walking away from any sense of obligation they may have felt about buying insurance for themselves.
I don't see this country surviving in any form you and I would recognize if Hillary Clinton wins the election. And I'm not saying the country is going to fall apart because of what Clinton will do in office. It's going to fall apart because many of its productive citizens aren't going to give a sh!t about it anymore.
The woman is batshit crazy.
CNN - Book says Hillary talks to dead - June 22, 1996
http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/
The INTENTIONAL lowering of security on her server system is the COURIER to deliver the state secrets to the paying “customers”. She supplies the user name, password, and software forks that leave the forensics to mimic a server hack break-in.
The claim by Clinton of Russia hacking is part of the ruse to use against Trump as if he’s part of the conspiracy to steal state secrets.
The server is the intentional courier and deliver agent for paid data.
Getting top secret or SAP off a JWICS from a SCIF into a non-secure system requires acts of extreme and exceptional ESPIONAGE.
Well now we know pedophilia is in play there is a very good chance klinton was talking to lynch about her grandchildren.
History as prognosticator.
There it is.....the problem in a nutshell.
To Lynch, Obama, the Clinton cabal.....there is no objective truth. The truth is what they say it is. It's true as long as it advances their agenda.
As the brilliant Dr Sebastian Gorka (a frequent Fox guest) put it. "These people are secular modernists."
They don't recognize concepts of right and wrong....the glue that's held civilization together for 2000 years.
Amen.
Through election or pardons, I think the Clintons will beat justice once again.
Yep. And everyone seems to be forgetting that Bill is involved, too. Bill Clinton, for some reason, has gotten away with crimes since he was first elected and probably even before then. I’ll never understand how a man from Arkinsaw could be so powerful BEFORE he got to the white house. Sold his soul to the devil has to be the reason. And maybe that’s why he always seems to have a worried look on his face. Pay up time is fast approaching.
What’s so breathtaking is we probably only know a small fraction of all the crimes they’ve committed.
They make Al Capone look like Mother Teresa.
Bears repeating...
The Clintons make Al Capone look like Mother Teresa.
You’d think getting caught stealing White House furniture would have driven from the stage, but not with democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.