Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump suggests Bobby Knight to threaten tariffs on companies moving jobs overseas
The Washington Examiner ^ | October 31, 2016 | Joseph Lawler

Posted on 11/01/2016 6:52:43 AM PDT by kevcol

Famed basketball coach Bobby Knight might be the one to call corporate executives and warn them of potential punitive tariffs if they move jobs overseas in a Trump administration, Donald Trump suggested Monday evening.

"I'll have Bobby Knight make the call," Trump said in a campaign stop in Warren, Mich., alongside the former Indiana college hoops coach.

"I think he could make the call better than anybody," the Republican nominee said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: bobbyknight; tariffs; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2016 6:52:43 AM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kevcol
"I'll have Bobby Knight make the call," Trump said in a campaign stop in Warren, Mich., alongside the former Indiana college hoops coach.

Didn't hear him say it, but it really sounds like he was joking to me.
2 posted on 11/01/2016 6:54:36 AM PDT by mmichaels1970 (Hillary lied over four coffins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

I’m waiting for Trump to tell Russia that uranium deal is off and if they want money back they’ll have to talk to the Clinton Foundation.


3 posted on 11/01/2016 6:54:37 AM PDT by Baynative (Freedom; the dream of every human, the birth right of every American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

I don’t like this one bit. That’s the kind of crap Democrats would do. Companies are free to do what they are incentivized to do. It is up to the government to not so overburden them with unfunded regulations and mandates that they find it advantageous to leave the United States.


4 posted on 11/01/2016 6:54:51 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Sounds like you need to get with the program.


5 posted on 11/01/2016 7:05:52 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Get used to Donald and his proverbial hyperbole. That’s the WWE, chair-over-head bustin’ side of him.


6 posted on 11/01/2016 7:17:31 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Donald kids a lot. He means this literally about as much as he meant appointing his 75 year old big sister to the USSC.


7 posted on 11/01/2016 7:18:20 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

And I think he will work on the incentives side of it, of which he has gotten a lot of smart advice. Really, removing the disincentives.


8 posted on 11/01/2016 7:19:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Perhaps you just forgot what it is like to beat the snot out of the opposition.


9 posted on 11/01/2016 7:19:50 AM PDT by Enduro Guy (Trump/Pence 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

We’ll get to the point where that approach can work. In the meantime we need to throw a few chairs...

Besides, democrats would actually impose the tax. Jawboning, like Trumps phone call, implies the threat of a tax, and the mere threat will be enough to cause many off-shoring decisions to be reconsidered. Especially within public companies who are concerned about adverse impact on the stock price. Today, there is nothing, no barrier to moving jobs out of the country. I’ve been involved in those deals and it looks like all upside.


10 posted on 11/01/2016 7:20:11 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

WTH do you think a tariff is? By shifting the corporate income tax from 35 to 15%, AND increasing the import Tariff from 0 to 35%, it is nothing but incentive. Incentive to remain in the USA.


11 posted on 11/01/2016 7:20:21 AM PDT by pissant ((Deport 'em all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

And that ultimately is not a sustainable situation. We won’t even be earning enough to buy the burgers whose flipping is the only domestic job.


12 posted on 11/01/2016 7:28:00 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
Manufacturers who move overseas can realize savings from salaries and government mandates regarding employment, along with insurance considerations regarding that same employment. But they also realize savings from no longer having to comply with occupational safety regulations and environmental discharge requirements. It may be reasonable to try to recoup these "savings" but is should be sold by Trump as employee safety and environmental considerations, rather than punishment.

The left can't rightly oppose these remedial events because such Trump actions would comport with democrat pretend core philosophical sales tools.

13 posted on 11/01/2016 7:31:59 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

It’s a hobby horse with me.

But ultimately an economy that doesn’t have everybody possible involved in the trade picture, is going to be hobbled.

There’s nothing wrong with “balanced” trade, where an equal value of goods goes both ways. Tariff policies should be tied to the balance. If there is 100% balance, no tariffs.


14 posted on 11/01/2016 7:32:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Only the problem is that we need to incentivize companies to actually do more of their manufacturing labor here in the United States. By putting the tax up there, you reduce the incentive of outsourced manufacturing being as cheap as it used to. It’s something that we need to push the incentives for, and with Trump, it’s still a bit too little too late.


15 posted on 11/01/2016 7:33:59 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

That’s another side of the picture.

I pray wisdom to Donald. There are so many possibilities that seem right but are wrong.


16 posted on 11/01/2016 7:35:02 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

The U.S. should lower regulations and corporate taxes. Many companies will not leave if this happens. It is stupid to penalize companies for moving overseas. Won’t work anyway.


17 posted on 11/01/2016 7:46:20 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
I don’t like this one bit. That’s the kind of crap Democrats would do. Companies are free to do what they are incentivized to do. It is up to the government to not so overburden them with unfunded regulations and mandates that they find it advantageous to leave the United States.

Always a few who missed the "Bus of Common Sense".

He wants to de-incentivize folks from leaving by lowering corporate taxes and making their off-shore money more available (10% vs. 35% tax to bring it back to the USA) and the tariffs are for those who opt to move away or who refuse to come back.

He has already explained the tariff plan and why it makes sense. The Bobby Knight quip was tongue-in-cheek praise for Bobby's tough, no nonsense style.

If that really causes you to have some "concerns with Trump" then you must be one of the die-hard Cruz/NeverTrump folks and this suggestion will likely really torque your jaws:

Donate to FR

18 posted on 11/01/2016 8:01:11 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

He’ll throw a chair at them.


19 posted on 11/01/2016 8:01:50 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

You understand that the founders viewed tarrifs as the way to fund the federal government right? Now, since the national socialist managed to get the income tax through, which is unconstitutional, they started this cancer of global socialism and it has reached its ultimate.

Read James Madisons opinon on tarrifs in a speech to the states, April 25th 1783.


20 posted on 11/01/2016 8:06:01 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson