Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wikileaks: Bob Creamer... is consulting for the DNC and is close to Robby Mook
Wikileaks ^ | 12/17/15

Posted on 10/30/2016 7:07:52 AM PDT by maggief


(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/30/2016 7:07:52 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maggief

The Mook is the smuggest ass ever.


2 posted on 10/30/2016 7:09:50 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“After Bernie loses”


3 posted on 10/30/2016 7:11:11 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Agent Leaker does not look Russian to me.

Thank you, honorable Special Agents, for refusing to comply with the cover-up orders.

Now, finish the job.


4 posted on 10/30/2016 7:12:20 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Mook....gay as a tap dancing hyena


5 posted on 10/30/2016 7:14:36 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Sounds like there was a plan in advance for Bernie to lose.


6 posted on 10/30/2016 7:15:28 AM PDT by uncitizen (Drain.The.Swamp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Robby Mook is smarmy and snarky. He’s pajama boy personified. He’s a snarky liberal know it all.

I bet he cries if Hillary loses. To his ilk, we are back in the middle ages if the evil Trump is in the White House. That’s how these people think.


7 posted on 10/30/2016 7:17:18 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Thugs, criminals, goons and glandhanders... propped up by a vast underclass.


8 posted on 10/30/2016 7:17:48 AM PDT by GOPJ ( "An honest public servant can't become rich in politics" - - President Harry S. Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Cheryl Mills is a close second. She seems to have a perpetual smirk on her face.


9 posted on 10/30/2016 7:26:17 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief
After Bernie loses

This email was sent in December 2015.

I wonder how the the progressive grass roots will feel about one of their top 'strategists' talking about Bernie Sanders campaign in the past tense before the first primary vote.

10 posted on 10/30/2016 7:34:02 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
The Mook is the smuggest ass ever.

He sucked his way to the top. He'll be spat out soon.

11 posted on 10/30/2016 7:50:49 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Follow the link to the message on Wikileaks -- they have added something new:

Secondary verification by google.com DKIM key

This is a big deal, and I wish there was an explanation, or at least a link to an explanation.

What this means is that the message was signed with DKIM when it originated at GMail. Neera Tanden sent the message from her Gmail account, and the DKIM signature was added to the header at that time.

What does this mean?

The message is authentic, and has not been modified since origination.

The DKIM signature is generated with a mathematical algorithm, using the content of the message and selected header fields as the input. In this case, the Date:, From:, Subject:, and To: fields are among the header fields verified.

More information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail

Why is this important?

The participants cannot claim the message has been "doctored" to make them look bad.


12 posted on 10/30/2016 7:56:45 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Still trying to figure out the real deal on the Mook twitter thing. I can’t find any old tweets from Mook

This article is dated 4/14/15 says he can’t remember is twitter password - yet he joined twitter on 2/10/15 and didn’t use it till October 26, 2016 according to J. Palmieri? Sounds bizarre.
https://www.queerty.com/meet-the-gay-man-who-is-going-to-be-running-hillarys-presidential-campaign-20150414


13 posted on 10/30/2016 8:31:16 AM PDT by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milford421

BIG correction - Mook joined twitter on

4//10/15 NOT 2/10/15


14 posted on 10/30/2016 8:32:13 AM PDT by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson