Posted on 10/28/2016 7:08:06 AM PDT by AndyJackson
Anyone with half a brain or an ounce of honesty left, knows that the John Podesta emails released by Wikileaks are authentic. If they weren’t, everyone implicated in them would have immediately and aggressively denied their claims rather than simply change the subject by blurting out some incoherent nonsense about Russia and Vladimir Putin.
So while most of us were already confident in their authenticity, a key tactic of corrupt Democratic operatives has been to try to cast doubt on them being real in order to sway the minds of some of our more cerebrally challenged fellow citizens. As such, any technical proof that the emails are genuine is of great significance, and we can thank Robert Graham of Errata Security for providing this.
He first grabbed my attention on the topic a few days ago with a series of tweets:
The fact is that many of the Wikileaks emails are verified by encrypted keys which detect the alteration of any significant content in the email [spaces are ignored and so adding spaces does not affect the validation.
I’ve noticed a number of the Wikileaked emails contain worries about Hillary. Now that Hillary herself has had a chance to see these, I wonder if Her Majesty, in a fit of pique, is falling out with the people who had worried about here?
here=>her
I’d think that when an email is sent, the sender and all recipients have a copy of it in their email servers unless they deleted it before their server’s data was backed up or hacked.
An individual had better not say his email was modified unless he’s sure there aren’t copies lying around.
That would really be a shame, wouldn’t it?
the point here is that the DKIM key allows the reader to prove the authenticity of the email independent of any claims by others, including the author.
Also, many emails contain unredacted phone numbers that people have called and confirmed they belong to big time Washington poobahs. So that is indirect confirmation at least. These are not listed phone numbers a hoaxer could easily get their hands on.
This would be the most terrible pity on the face of the earth! [lol]
There’s not very many Democrats denying this are authentic, if any, they just don’t talk about them, or deny their importance.
Just like the media does.
It’s the move along, nothing to see here strategy.
And unfortunately, the media lets it work.
There are not very many Democrats denying these are authentic, if any, they just don’t talk about them, or they deny their importance.
Just like the media does.
It’s the move along, nothing to see here strategy.
And unfortunately, the media lets it work.
DKIM validates the headers of the message, not the content. There are ways to sign the body of the message, but they apparently didn’t use anything like that.
I called Doug Band a few weeks ago and left him a filthy voicemail message, he called me back 20 mins later but left nothing...lol
NBC keeps referring to them as the STOLEN emails, hoping they will distract people from the actual content of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.