Oh crap. Axleshaft said that? You know he's lying. As usual. I propose that someone, anyone, cobble a bill together forbidding any relative, by blood or marriage, from running for the presidency for at least 100 years after their relative served in that position. NO DYNASTIES! You could tie it to term limits as well.
1 posted on
10/21/2016 8:18:07 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
10/21/2016 8:20:28 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: rktman
She’d more likely join The View.
3 posted on
10/21/2016 8:20:38 AM PDT by
jimfree
(In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
To: rktman
So that means she will at some point.
4 posted on
10/21/2016 8:21:26 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(precious bodily fluids)
To: rktman
Michelle in 2024 to 2032, then it is Chelsea’s turn.
5 posted on
10/21/2016 8:21:52 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(I am deplorable.)
To: rktman
8 posted on
10/21/2016 8:23:01 AM PDT by
ColdOne
((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Because you'd be in jail!)
To: rktman
I think being POTUS would involve with her mooching too much. Being paid a large some of money for berating Americans will provide her the lifestyle she is accustomed to with a lot less work.
10 posted on
10/21/2016 8:25:26 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
To: rktman
11 posted on
10/21/2016 8:25:33 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Time for a Tea Party II)
To: rktman
Democrats always say one thing then do the opposite.
13 posted on
10/21/2016 8:26:34 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Time for a Tea Party II)
To: rktman
Ya , she’s way too Crabby
To: rktman
“the current First Lady wants a non-electoral life”
__________________
“non-electoral” is an unusual choice of words ...does that means she desires an lifetime appointed position??? Hmmm, maybe SCOTUS???
To: rktman
Translation: She will run. She just wants people to beg her to run.
17 posted on
10/21/2016 8:30:17 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: rktman
Michelle O. knows good and well that if she wants to serve the country, she doesn’t really have to sweat it. The job, or a similar job will be hers, no problem. Either she will simply be appointed to a position, such as head of a committee or an ambassadorship, or the dems will ‘cook the votes’ for her.
Worse comes to worst and she has to outright run for a nomination “and stuff’, efforts will be made to elimmnate all true competitors. She will be running against a group of nobodies who have comparatively no money.
So, if I, a true ‘nobody’, can figure out how this system works, I know Michelle’s group can do the same if she so chooses. Oh, and then, there is always the chance that she does run fairly, and simply is not popular enough to sufficiently cheat and carve out a win. She may lose and lose big.
To: rktman
Easy bet, she never would want to do the work. Moochelle is lazy and now can live a life of luxury, with or without Barry.
21 posted on
10/21/2016 8:36:29 AM PDT by
bigbob
(The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
To: rktman; Gamecock; wastedyears; Jamestown1630; ColdOne; dfwgator
I agree with the AxelRod. Running for & holding an office is a lot of work. I’ve seen no proof that she is interested in doing any actual work.
She will have a life-time position as “former first lady” as well as life-time SS protection. Additionally, if she ever feels the need for a little extra spending money she can give speeches for cash - any time.
No, I don’t think she has the burning desire for POWER - like Hillary. IMO - she will be happy to remain what she is - the moocher...
23 posted on
10/21/2016 8:42:30 AM PDT by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: rktman
She, and whats his face, probably can’t wait to leave America.
25 posted on
10/21/2016 8:54:35 AM PDT by
Leep
(Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
To: rktman
This country is exhausted by the same old, tired electoral inbred and incestuous politics. The Founding Fathers would scoff at what we have become politically. Could you imagine a dynasty of Washingtons and Jeffersons? Of course not because George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would strongly forbid it. The unwritten Constitutional rule rule was that we do not have dynasties nor anything resembling King and monarchy. The intent, I believe, was that the President would have far less power than it is present today and that congress critters were HONORABLE, 100% answerable to WE THE PEOPLE and in no way could make a living off of public service becoming multimillionaires. Most in government today would be tried and hung for the reason and Constitutional lawlessness. The new normal is a disgrace! I totally agree that term limits and restrictions are needed on who can and cannot run for office.
26 posted on
10/21/2016 8:55:05 AM PDT by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: rktman
Nah, I believe him. Michelle is of the type that wants to do the least amount of work for the greatest rewards.
To: rktman
Translation: Trump will signal the end of political dynasties in this country.
To: All
Didn’t she have an ethics investigation by the Illinois Bar that resulted in her “voluntarily” giving up her law license?
To: rktman
The Wookie will not dare endure exposure of the transvestite deception that played the American public for fools. A campaign risks exposure from someone digging in the wrong place.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson