Bitch is guilty as charged.
Is something finally going to stick to the Teflon Witch?
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
I can’t believe the Tribune printed this.
THIS should be front page news across the country!!
I already sent the Moracco thing to CNN and all the alphabets as well as a few reporters from Breitbart that i’ve met on twitter.
Seperate Huma from Hillary and she will fold.
Remember “pay to play” is just a nice sounding name for bribery. And she never denied it.
She sounds and looks so guilty.
And what gives with that creepy smile, that was chilling.
The Sickly Sow ignores the questions it doesn’t like.
Its fawning servants (AKA MSM) are none to happy to behave likewise.
America is taking notice, and the aroma of Roast Piggy is wafting in the political breeze already.
The Clinton defenders and the Clintons always fall back on “there is no evidence” or “there is no proof” of criminal or unethical actions.
Of course not. Criminals do their best to cover their crimes by leaving no direct evidence of their crimes. They try to have “cut-outs” or third parties involved to protect them. That’s what they do. And that’s why the RICO law became the principal way to attack the leadership of the Mafia.
Criminals are often convicted by circumstantial evidence which can be even more compelling.
Pay to play is bribery, pure and simple. It is a crime and should be treated as such. The cure is to require all political donations to be ANONYMOUS. American citizens should be permitted to donate to any candidate or party they choose, any amount they wish. That is FREEDOM. But exchanging the donation for an outcome is criminal.
Make it a felony to disclose a donor or to attempt to identify a donor, frogmarch a few violators off to jail on the six o’clock news, and the problem mostly goes away.
Well there really is no good response to clear cut bribery and TREASON, but Wallace let her off the hook too easily.
Uh, about that HIV medication she mentioned. She left out the part about it being watered down and causing serious problems including premature deaths.
