Here's a more detailed version (too wordy for main stream internet viewers though)
Posted on 10/20/2016 7:37:32 AM PDT by mandaladon
It was a stroke of genius for Trump to banish WaPo reporters from covering his campaign earlier this year.
Nothing eats away at their guts like the thought of being frozen out of White House press events for four solid years.
To Beltway media insiders that’s the equivalent of being forced to consume a glass of Jim Jones Kool-Aid.
Hence the suck-up has begun. Hail our New Trumpian Overlord!
I mean I thought Trump did good, but I thought the Second one was the best.
Maybe because they were up walking around.
These were my thoughts last night. Also, on FBN this morning, the polling gal (I don't know her name) showed three dials reflecting moments in the debate. The Indies were strongly for Trump all three times.
Is this the same outfit as the one that decreed on Monday that Herself! had already won?
If so, time to pivot and start sucking-up to the new POTUS.
When you hopefully start to see folks in her campaign heading for the exits to save their integrity you will know why WaPo wrote this article.
She lost when she pointed out the violence at the trump rallies right after he exposed her with WikiLeaks.stupid cluntons.
Ack, my browser won’t let me read past their paywall...!
Perhaps someone could post the remainder of the article... ? Not signing up for no compost!
I’m guessing the parent companies are thinking twice about its continual pissing on the Country, its Citizens, and the Constitution.
Those fed up with the MSM must take action by suspending every possible form of patronage to these abusive operations.
I think that they may be running scared re: what O’Keefe may have unearthed on the WaPo
Or perhaps it's just an op-ed from their token Republican?
[ the polling gal (I don’t know her name)]
Lee Carter.
Yes, Lee Carter.
Thanks. That is outstanding.
WaPo’s parent company is Amazon.
If we all choose to do to them what we’re doing to the NFL...
Trump for President.
I watched for about one hour.
Clinton was parroting the same old tired rhetoric Democrats have used for at least the last 40 years.
Wallace would allow Clinton to ramble on and on and on. Whenever Trump started giving responses that were a little too hot or discomforting, Wallace would interrupt him — usually after the first or second sentence of Trump’s responses.
At one point, Wallace became the opposition and entered the debate against Trump, while Clinton got a brief respite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.