[rktman]

And yet, as in the tearing down of DJT, the msm build up and collusion in pushing this false meme, carry forward as if the plans are based on actual facts. And, as in the same mode, there are too many ignorant people who buy whatever is spoon fed them without question. We are in serious trouble and a helldabama win would sink this country even further. Even if you're not happy with the "R" running in your local races, there is no way the can be allowed to regain control of the house or senate. 'Specially if helldabama were to win. Am I PO'd at joe heck for pulling his DJT support? Uh, yeah. Will I vote for him anyway? To keep kathy mantos(hairy reed jr) from attaining that open seat? Uh, yeah. Looks like Paul will be admonished and made to wear a "Scarlet 'D'" around his neck.

[rellimpank]

—agree—even though annoyed at Heck and Cresent Hardy I certainly won’t “not vote” against the Dems-—

[DJ Taylor]

How soon we forget.

It was Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish scientist (1859-1927), who was the first to theorize in 1896 that fossil fuel combustion could create a “Greenhouse Effect” and stall or prevent what was feared to be a pending ice-age.

[palmer]

a moderately warmer planet with more atmospheric carbon dioxide would hugely benefit crop, forest and other plant growth, wildlife and humans

On the money. Thanks to global warming (and efficiency) we no longer have to use as much energy for heating: http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10271 but heating still requires almost 7 times as much energy as cooling.

[katana]

Asking whether human activity affects global climate is like asking whether a fly walking across the Statue of Liberty will cause her to tilt over and fall into New York harbor. We are an infinitesimally tiny fraction of the biosphere and that biosphere itself is a microscopic green fuzz on the surface of the globe. It and we live only by the heat energy of the sun and a temporary reprieve from geologic and astronomic catastrophe.

The argument over AGW is simply a cover story and excuse for the reduction of the human population back to immediate post-glaciation levels. Most of that residue population, elites aside, could be kept in a state of "nasty, brutal, and short" existence. And all this of course assumes that none of the "elites" pushing for it or their progeny would be included in the cull or the post-cull reversion to a "natural" existence.

[TYVets]

No Real-World evidence supports a “dangerous manmade climate change”

Dangerous Manmade Climate Change

Let us hope the enviorwackos do not latch onto that for their next climate name change.

[Bob]

Your link isn’t working — 404 error

[Revolutionary]

The simple story in two parts:
1. Global warming is based on models predicting the future. Every one of the models has been proven, proven, proven wrong by actual events.

2. China is pumping out the most CO2 and the amount is growing. The U.S. has gone down by 25%. The China increase more than wipes out the decrease in the western world. If global warming was so dire, the entire emphasis would be placed on China, with India a close second. But the liberals always give them a pass. So the liberals know it isn’t true.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Despite constant claims to the contrary, the issue is not whether greenhouse gas emissions affect Earth’s climate.

Actually, yes it is and there is even a major question about what actually is a "greenhouse gas".