I wonder how much the Clinton Foundation paid Gannett for this.
Is there a downside to this? 😆
I think perhaps these group owned papers were TOLD to endorse Hitlery.
Gannett also bought both major papers in the Detroit market years ago. The Detroit Free Press was the liberal rag. The Detroit News was the “conservative” paper. After Gannett bought them both, they began to change the editorial slant of the News to a more liberal bent. Now we see that the News has decided to break a pattern that is over a hundred years old of endorsing Republicans as they picked Johnson over Trump just yesterday. What Gannett has done is to totally alienate their News readers to the point that the News will now disappear from the Detroit area market. Subscriptions will fall to the point that the News will be another NYTimes, becoming a just another bankrupt liberal rag, like the Arizona Republic is sure to follow.
Just orders from Gannet HQ.
Editorial boards stocked with activists consumed with the concepts of inclusiveness, tolerance for any deviant behavior and the universal goodness of all mankind. Dinosaurs from the kumbaya age.
Their revenues are going down faster than a fly in a frog’s gullet. And this is a sane business model?
Well, Duuuhhh!
What they are really saying, Trump is a clear and present danger to the survival of the purchased media. (Press-titutes)
But the real danger to the nation is the Globalist Cabal including the media.
The AJC (Atlanta Journal Constitution) has been giving away Sunday papers in my neighborhood for the past six weeks.
Why in the world someone would pay for that junk is beyond me.
Coupons is the only reason I can think of.
By the time you get print media is old news.
I saved them so I can use them as weed barriers in my vegetable garden next spring.
Another newspaper comes out against Trump with unsupported assertions to "justify" their incoherent claims.
The odd thing about this are the flimsy, pathetic, and unsupported excuses offered by this formerly great newspaper. They are too eager to trash Trump.
Follow the money!
So the print media is calling us deplorable and irredeemable. It’s no wonder I haven’t read a newspaper in years.
The article tries to portray these editorial boards as thoughtful and impressive, using historians and agonizing over the decision.
They signed an economic suicide pact—their Jonestown.
There is nothing “thoughtful” about that!
> But he said financial considerations were never a factor for the newspapers nine-person editorial board. It was more of a curiosity, he said. We know were doing the right thing. We feel very good about this decision.
Are they expecting a payoff if she wins?
Stupid is as stupid does. Just what did these paper editors think would be the outcome? Apparently, they have been reading and embracing too much of their own tripe for too long. Time to join the real world.
Trump is a clear and present danger to OUR country.
So in other words, they think Trump supporters are not American citizens and have no right to choose the president of THEIR country.
Cancel subscriptions. Whoever doesn’t do so is complicit with the enemy.
Msm is reporting “another major newspaper” is urging it’s readers to be sure to vote just not for Trump. Listen long and you hear it’s usa today that nobody reads. Chuck retard airhead concentrating on the first time aspect. Oh how they hate and postulate.
Here’s a radical idea.
Newspapers should report the news ...and stop editorializing. If I want to read an opinion piece I can go online. Some of the comments here on FR for example are far more insightful and thought provoking than I’ve ever read in an old fashioned newspaper.
Why should I pay good money to a newspaper that endorses a lying criminal?
But EVERYONE loves Hillary and is voting for her historic election... Right??
Talk about mixed messages! The enemedia needs to coordinate their propaganda better.
They will be considerations once the next round of layoffs hit.
Vote with your feet. I wonder what Michael Medved's latest ratings book will look like...