Posted on 09/27/2016 10:19:25 AM PDT by Publius
Hannity and Chris Matthews. Let’s end the myth of objective newscasters and moderators and get two partisans for a real fight. Dueling pistols allowed.
[Even more interesting is, how have none of the people attending the Goldman Sachs speeches leaked any of the content?]
Would you want to be on the Clinton body count?
Sec. Clinton, do you support the sale of baby parts?
Right Rudy, /s
Tell ‘em no more debates with the Democrat’s/Left’s spin machine at full speed ahead this morning, and into the future defying all facts of almost every snap poll they will take your refusal to debate further, and spin it as a concession that Hillary won, and DJT was so battered by her brilliance he’s afraid to face her again.
I don’t think that sort of bullshit is what Mr. Trump’s campaign really needs. Let’s get on with the debates such as they are, and this time leave no arrows in that quiver.
Trump should have also said this “WOW Mrs. Clinton, I must say I am VERY impressed with your ability to remember everything I ever said going back 20 years, but when you talked to the FBI you said “I could not recall” 38 times” unbelievable
In a genuine debate there would be no ad hominems allowed, and only topic allowed would be stated at the start. These "debates" are, of course, nothing of the sort. They may be useful as platforms of comparison, but nobody can be declared a loser who finishes. So the decision to participate must be on criteria other than reason-based. I'm of the opinion that Trump stands to gain more, and Hillary to lose more, by participating. Just my $0.02.
That's going to be hard to find
>>I dont think this is the kind of narrative that should be set.
It really should. Everyone knows that the media is in the tank for the Progs. Even if Trump was well-prepared for all of Holt’s partisanship and laughed it off afterwards, the narrative needs to be out there that the Leftist Media is OUR enemy and is the mortal enemy of freedom. Send out the attack dogs, make some headlines, get a few concessions for the next debate and then come in prepared and ready to make Hillary bleed from her whatever.
Debate who?
Trump was fine with debating both Les & Ill... he just finished debating up to a dozen other Republicans at one time this spring. The jokes on the liberals
I thought about that too.
[Debate who?]
He could respond to a monitor of HILLARY and her canned responses.
I want to see Hannity moderate. This debate method is pure transparent advocacy bullshit.
It’s a dumbass comment. Hillobeans fired all of her bullets last night. Trump fired about 3 out of 500 bullets. Like Mr . T said in Rocky III, “You want some mo’? I got lotsa mo’!”
You raise an interesting point I had not considered. Now as I am thinking about it though I am not convinced the MSM and Hillary will not revisit those issues. There is no rule that says they can't. Trump would probably get into defensive posture for umpteen minutes all over again. He's hard-coded that way.
Hadn’t heard much of a peep on FB from the democrats until this morning. They are in full swing today. I’m a true believer that FB posts should be non-political in order to keep friendships going in a positive direction. It’s hard to look at someone the same when they are morons.
And doing a fine job. He is on the top of his game.
Hadn’t heard much of a peep on FB from the democrats until this morning. They are in full swing today. I’m a true believer that FB posts should be non-political in order to keep friendships going in a positive direction. It’s hard to look at someone the same when they are morons.
Misleading headline.
Bad advice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.