Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Union leader says Question 1 is not about the Second Amendment(Nevada)
guns.com ^ | 9/19/2016 | Christen Smith

Posted on 09/20/2016 9:41:00 AM PDT by rktman

The leader of a statewide law enforcement union said Sunday Nevada’s expanded background check ballot question isn’t about protecting the Second Amendment — it’s about promoting public safety.

Jim Dunlap, president of the Nevada Association of Public Safety Officers, told the Las Vegas Sun he disagrees with most of the state’s sheriffs when it comes to Question 1.

“As top law enforcement officials, they have an obligation to their employees and to the people who elect them,” he said. “They say their opposition is about the Second Amendment, but our stand is on public safety. This measure will make it safer for our communities, safer for public employees and safer for the people we represent.”

Dunlap’s union represents 1,500 police officers, corrections officers and probation officers throughout Nevada.

“With this background check, we’ll close the loophole and prevent them (criminals) from getting a weapon at a gun show or meeting a guy in a parking lot (after using a website to set up a gun sale) and going home still angry,” he said. “We are saving people’s lives.”

(Excerpt) Read more at guns.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; nevada; nv; question1
What a load of crap. I've seen this ad a couple of times and lucky the TV has survived(or not). Similar to the sales pitch that the bloomberg sponsored petition signature gatherers used. Criminals will NEVER be able to get a gun if we pass this. Crazy people will NEVER be able to get a gun if we pass this. Domestic violence will end once and for all if we pass this. You psoriasis will be cured if we pass this. Lies, lies and more lies. The ever idiotic nanny bloomers and the momunists have a war chest in excess of $3 million dollars pushing this in Nevada. Pro second amendment folks are barely breaking $30,000. Wish us luck in defeating this piece of garbage. Their new goal is to overcome the "Background Check Loophole."
1 posted on 09/20/2016 9:41:00 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
You psoriasis will be cured if we pass this.

That's a pretty powerful argument right there. If we could cure the heartbreak of psoriasis for only a few people...

2 posted on 09/20/2016 9:42:42 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

an enemy of the constitution is my enemy also. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.


3 posted on 09/20/2016 9:43:06 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Most certainly is about the SECOND AMENDMENT. Safety is in there too...but this has leftist fingerprints all over it.


4 posted on 09/20/2016 9:45:42 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Jim Dunlap, president of the Nevada Association of Public Safety Officers...is one of those domestic enemies we’ve been warned about.


5 posted on 09/20/2016 9:46:34 AM PDT by MeganC (JE SUIS CHARLES MARTEL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
– Benjamin Franklin


6 posted on 09/20/2016 9:46:58 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The leader of a statewide law enforcement union said Sunday Nevada’s expanded background check ballot question isn’t about protecting the Second Amendment — it’s about promoting public safety.

Odd, that is precisely what the 2dA is about.

7 posted on 09/20/2016 9:48:13 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

‘“With this background check, we’ll close the loophole and prevent them (criminals) from getting a weapon at a gun show or meeting a guy in a parking lot (after using a website to set up a gun sale) and going home still angry,” he said. “We are saving people’s lives.”’

Clealy this isnt the case. Criminals still get guns and no amt of checking will stop that.


8 posted on 09/20/2016 9:50:45 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"said Sunday Nevada’s expanded background check ballot question isn’t about protecting the Second Amendment — it’s about promoting public safety."

And if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. Never trust a word these people say.

9 posted on 09/20/2016 9:51:46 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Listen to this load of pure horseshit:

Reporter: But what about the argument that someone in that same situation could go to the black market?

Dunlop: People don’t stand on corners and sell drugs or guns. The criminal element, the people who are involved in the black market, they sell only to people they know. That’s why cops use confidential informants to buy drugs. And even within those organizations in the drug trade, and when you have a confidential informant, trying to purchase a gun is even more of a challenge, because use or possession of a firearm with those crimes comes with heightened penalties. So how do you find someone to buy a gun from on the black market? If you did find someone dealing guns illegally and said, “Hey, you got a gun I can buy?” They’d probably say, “Are you a cop?” So that just won’t happen. People see it on TV shows, but it doesn’t happen.

I have never seen a Union head of Police Officers that has ZERO clue about crime, before.

10 posted on 09/20/2016 9:55:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (MSM ignoring Hillary's health until forced, shows us they are the MPM: Ministry of Propaganda Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine; rktman

It would be a better use of time and effort to cure the heartbreak of cirrhosis...


11 posted on 09/20/2016 10:15:06 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hope the sheeple of Nevada see through the crap this bureaucrat masquerading as a law enforcement officer is spouting.


12 posted on 09/20/2016 10:27:39 AM PDT by ZULU (Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the New World Order since Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Was the union position arrived at by a majority vote of the membership by secret ballot?

Didn't think so.

13 posted on 09/20/2016 10:35:42 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Call it what it is - a National Gun Registration scheme.

Look at how much info you have to give the government**. In order to get a background check, the buyer/seller have to use an FFL dealer. He in turn requires the buyer to fill out (2005 version)
PAGE ONE
and
PAGE TWO. Pay attention to items 26-30.

Print these out, carry them with you and when the next numbnuts bleats about "lessening crime", have him to fill these two sheets out and ask him if he feels comfortable that the govt has all this info on him.

The problem is that the non-gun-owning public doesn't give a crap about registration, so I suspect Nevada will be the next state to go this route.

**Theoretically, these forms are supposed to stay with the dealer until he quits business. Evidently the BATF can't wait that long as reports have come in from all parts of the country that when the agents do an annual audit, they photocopy the dealer's entire book of 4473s.

14 posted on 09/20/2016 10:53:24 AM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

A load of garbage from a statist progressive bozo.


15 posted on 09/20/2016 11:28:59 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Our Founders knew that without freedom and liberty, there will eventually be no safety nor security.


16 posted on 09/20/2016 12:06:56 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson