How does one apply to be included on the list? Does calling climate hoaxers deluded jerks work? How about driving a diesel pickup? Burning leaves? Making fun of Al Gore?
What does it take?
Yeah no kidding! Hey Mann! You forgot me! I’m being disenfranchised! I’m being discriminated against! I demand inclusion on that list of heretics. Where’s my high priced attorney’s phone number? Injustice like this must be put before that law. I want lots of money to make me feel better. My nose is cold...
You either agree with the Left or you’re branded as a heretic. Its their way or the highway.
If anyone tells you that The SUN is in no way a participant in the Temperature on Earth(Climate Science)you Should HIT THEM for being Stupid.
Remember the days when science was questioned and tested? Good times, my friend.
We’re a basket of deplorable deniers.
Interesting that Mark Steyn isn’t on that list.
In November 2009, an anonymous whistleblower put over 1000 emails comprising to and from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) on an obscure Russian website. They were subsequently rapidly disseminated around the world.
These emails show a tightly knit cabal of scientists adjusting temperature data to conform to their political agenda; exerting pressure to censor publications going into the “peer reviewed” literature (usually with complete success); bullying journalists with threats of excommunication so that what was published in the mainstream media was in accordance with the global warming agenda; and using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the primary vehicle for their political ambitions.
To work through these emails, in order to discover what was going on, is a major undertaking. John Costella has provided us with an edited and annotated account of the emails which enables the lay person, in a relatively short time, to understand what was going on and how it was done.
This PDF version of the published book will provide access to everyone who is concerned with this great debate. It is available here.
http://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-emails.pdf
Put Michael Mann in jail for perpetrating a hoax!
You must join the Religion of Global Warming or you’ll be sacrificed to the Great Wind-turbine God
Lookie here:
If you have a meteorologist you trust to warn you about storms, etc., he/she is also probably an “anthropogenic climate change” skeptic!!!! That is true of nearly the entire meteorology profession.
These people should ALWAYS be referred to as “skeptics”. The term “denier” is a fascist or communist meme designed to smear people, and target them for attack!!!!
Michael Mann? Isn’t he he person that came up with “hockey stick” graph that was later discovered to be created with cooked data?
Wouldn’t there actually have to be science to question? In this case, I’m questioning the propaganda, because I’ve seen no evidence that the Scientific Method was used.
Analysis shows that any given location on this Earth has been much colder and much warmer in the past. Sea levels have been higher and lower, as well. Current coastal regions have underlying limestone that was deposited by those higher seas.
All of this has happened long before the Industrial Revolution, and even before the dawn of civilization. And it will keep happening, despite mankind's futile attempts to prevent it.
But, no one has "proved" that mankind is making any significant to "climate change". None of the predictive models have come even close to predicting the actual temperature record in the past 20 years. I spent many years working with statistical modeling, and that outcome means the model is broken.
The proper response is to go back to your model and figure out what data input you missed, or how your model interprets the data you are using. The improper response is to continue to claim that the actual behavior is an "anomaly".
You may remember the original model that produced the "hockey stick" graph. What you might not know: an independent researcher took that model and fed it different data. It still produced the "hockey stick". He fed it random data. It still produced the "hockey stick". In fact, he found that no matter what data he fed to the model, it still produced the "hockey stick".
I'm beginning to believe that "climate scientists" are the guys that couldn't make the grade in a respectable research laboratory doing real science, and are instead engaging in what amounts to fraud. But, since their results happen to support a certain political ideology, they are getting more attention than they deserve.
Put me on the list.......
This EcoWatch is another branch of EnviroNazis, fueled by UN’s Agenda 21, a huge totalitarian-favoring effort. Same as Animal Rights and Green Peace. Same as the DNC. All are Leftist orgs who hate individual freedom and love totalitarian government. These are generally very sad people who by-and-large have rejected the freedom Christ offers, are generally miserable people who want everyone else to be miserable too. If they can’t persuade you to join them in their misery, they want to force you into their miserable world through government coercion. It is really the spirit of antichrist.
It is all about envy. The miserable envying and hating the happy and free. Just as Jesus was killed because of envy (Matt. 27:18), so the world gradually moves to worldwide totalitarianism because of envy.
These are previews of coming attractions. The foundation is being laid but it’s not time yet for these fascists to have their day. I believe in a few decades, however, when the church is taken up to Heaven with the Holy Spirit (1 Thess. 4:17; 2 Thess. 2:5-8), then they will have their way, get more than they bargained for, and all Hell will literally break loose before the Lord returns with us to destroy those who hate him and establish his rule here as King of Kings and Lord of Lords (Rev 11:18; Rev 19:11-21). What a day that will be.
Just need to say anyone with a brain, and knows how to use it should be the only list they need.
How do I sign up?