[minnesota_bound]

A bad Star Trek tv show. You would have thought after Star Trek Enterprise they would try to do better.

[BenLurkin]

With a guy like this in charge, what could go wrong?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Bryan_Fuller_at_2016_Comic-Con_International.jpg/330px-Bryan_Fuller_at_2016_Comic-Con_International.jpg

[Pravious]

“A bad Star Trek tv show. You would have thought after Star Trek Enterprise they would try to do better.”

Their rampant, preachy liberal BS was always the worst thing about Star Trek, from day one. Now that they’ve become more confident at bleating their perversions and garbage, I suspect it will finally go over the line and make the show unwatchable.

“At least one gay character!” cries the ads. Oh, good. And here I was WONDERING what TV characters DID with their penises.

[Riley]

You would have thought after Star Trek Enterprise they would try to do better.

They could have done a lot more with Enterprise. I LOVED the 50s-retro, clunky, gray sheet-metal feel that the tech had at first.

I am watching a lot of TNG on BBC America right now, and once in a while I run across an episode that I never saw when it was running. AWESOME one today, 'Ship in a Bottle', revisiting the sentient holodeck character Professor Moriarty, with nested illusions of reality. Thoroughly enjoyed that.

[freedumb2003]

>>You would have thought after Star Trek Enterprise they would try to do better.<<

Until this no one thought they could do worse. A reminder that Hollywierd can ALWAYS do worse!