Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

I thought GB already had these kind of laws in place.


3 posted on 08/18/2016 3:52:20 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

They do have the led. What the muzzie mayor is doing is to increase the number of jackboots on the ground to suppress free speech.


4 posted on 08/18/2016 3:59:12 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

There’s a difference in having certain laws on the books and occasionally making an example of someone in order to suppress disliked speech. It’s another thing to devote over 2 million dollars to seek out thought criminals within a single city. This is a major ramping up of the police state in London.


11 posted on 08/18/2016 5:10:09 AM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

The United Kingdom already has law enforcement which has the functionality of reviewing complaints over hate crimes. What the London Mayor is attempting to do....is create his own force....who would report to him....and thus make it a London law enforcement tool only. If you resided outside of the city....say in Wales....and their judge didn’t care to hear the charges...then London would drag the poor sap down into their “hell-hole” for charges there.

This is simply another sign why the UK needs to have one simple system for the general public....and not invent all kinds of EU-functionality to drag people into some mess.


12 posted on 08/18/2016 5:24:13 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson