Skip to comments.
Renowned lawyer who represented Julian Assange died after being struck by train (tr; from 4/23/16)
Ham High ^
Posted on 08/10/2016 8:55:04 AM PDT by TigerClaws
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: haircutter
THE CLINTON LIST, GROWS ALMOST DAILY..
WHY? Because that's how many enemies they perceive themselves as having.
To: TigerClaws
The scheming VP character pushes a reporter into the path of an oncoming subway. It's a start.
22
posted on
08/10/2016 9:21:12 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
To: TigerClaws
Haven’t seen this many people turn up dead since the LBJ years in which so many people investigating the Kennedy assassination were found dead.
http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKdeaths.htm
Maybe Bill and Hill are going for a record.
To: A CA Guy
or if you knew your wife and children would be killed if you weren’t.
24
posted on
08/10/2016 9:25:22 AM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: TigerClaws
Why in the world was he walking down the tracks? /s
25
posted on
08/10/2016 9:26:16 AM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: TigerClaws
I think this next batch of e-mail/docs are going to land the Clintons in court.
But if all the key would be witnesses are dead their lies are all there is.
26
posted on
08/10/2016 9:26:19 AM PDT
by
PattyinMD
(Reboot)
To: Blue Jays
I was mentioning all the deaths lately surrounding Clinton to a liberal colleague today. Their response? “I wonder which side is really doing it.”
I kid you not.
27
posted on
08/10/2016 9:28:27 AM PDT
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Lorianne
watch House of Cards...I'm guessing this guys "accident" took place just out of reach of security cameras
To: TigerClaws
OMG - was this the man holding the dead man’s switch?
29
posted on
08/10/2016 9:35:58 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
("Tired of 'fake outrage' deployed by democrats and their MSM gimp platoon?" - Kurt Schlichter)
To: Lorianne
Using a train is better than a nail gun.
30
posted on
08/10/2016 9:37:39 AM PDT
by
zek157
To: TigerClaws
I’d have to hear more details, but I’d also have to admit you just don’t get hit by a train very easily.
Your car has to stall on the tracks, you have to misjudge your clearance, you have to fall on the tracks, or someone has to shove or toss you on the tracks.
The last one here seems to be the easiest to have take place.
How often do we hear of a person being hit by a train?
For all the people exposed to trains one way or another, the percentages are very low, those who get hit by one.
That percentage being that low, and this guy being a high profile person, it just seems likely there was foul play.
The police don’t think so. Are they naive or do I need to adjust the fit of my aluminum hat?
31
posted on
08/10/2016 9:38:31 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
To: Mr. Douglas
Yeah, it’s so much more likely for a Republican to kill a person about to testify against Clinton.
/s
32
posted on
08/10/2016 9:40:01 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
To: TigerClaws
Let me guess... no witnesses?
33
posted on
08/10/2016 9:40:12 AM PDT
by
BeauBo
To: TigerClaws
I notice how the article fails to mention any particular on how he came to be struck and killed by a train.
To: DoughtyOne
Exactly. I was at work, so I didn’t want to push it.
35
posted on
08/10/2016 9:43:34 AM PDT
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: TigerClaws
36
posted on
08/10/2016 9:44:04 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(<<<<<a<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
To: Mr. Douglas
I was mentioning all the deaths lately surrounding Clinton to a liberal colleague today. Their response? I wonder which side is really doing it.
Cui bono. Who benefits?
To: TigerClaws
Straight out of “House of Cards.”
38
posted on
08/10/2016 9:46:27 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: needmorePaine
Cui bono. Who benefits?
They will say “Trump”, because it makes Hillary look like a murderer and hurts her chances to win.
Seriously. It’s kinda comical. It’s a bit like trying to tell kids that their mother is a no good tramp. They won’t believe it even if she has tracks up both arms and brings home three or four Johns a night. She’s their mother - and hillary supporters are children, regardless of chronological age.
39
posted on
08/10/2016 9:49:01 AM PDT
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Mr. Douglas
40
posted on
08/10/2016 9:52:18 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson