Undercover video exposes eye-popping ease of voter fraud

WND.com ^ | August 3, 2016 | Chelsea Schilling

[Biggirl]

An explosive undercover video shows just how startlingly simple it is for anyone to commit voter fraud in Michigan – even when the voter provides no I.D. and falsely assumes the identity of a well-known columnist. The undercover footage was released Tuesday by Project Veritas founder and pioneering investigative reporter James O’Keefe.

[Red Badger]

Anywhere democraps are in charge, voter fraud is not only easy, it’s required.......................

[D Rider]

Democrats are by their very nature murderers and thieves. The rules of basic decency do not apply to them.

[OttawaFreeper]

But, but, I thought that a recent court case involving a state’s voter ID law mentioned that there were only about one or two recent episodes of clearly documented voter fraud that justified criminal charges?

[Biggirl]

That safe to say is a cover-up to what is really is going on.

[PROCON]

The 'rats cheat, it's what they do..

[Robert A Cook PE]

Oh - And that method too.

But, who says the displayed vote is what is the recorded vote either, right?

[Lower Deck]

Voter ID laws are meant to suppress votes and not combat the kind of voter fraud that can turn elections, because that kind of fraud is not done up front through individual votes cast. It’s done in the back room where hundreds or thousands or tens of thousand votes can be manufactured.

[Blood of Tyrants]

We have a voting system that is the envy of every tin pot dictator in the world.

[RandallFlagg]

I hope James and his team are sending this stuff to Trump. TrueTheVote, as well.

[PROCON]

Yup, it doesn't matter who votes as much as who counts the votes.

[ptsal]

Remember the abacus machines in Chicago? The paddle filled , lever pulled, Dailey got the vote.....

[Blennos]

Voter ID laws are meant to suppress votes and not combat the kind of voter fraud that can turn elections, because that kind of fraud is not done up front through individual votes cast. It’s done in the back room where hundreds or thousands or tens of thousand votes can be manufactured.

What!? Voter ID laws are intended to ensure that only bona fide voters cast ballots and only one time. The only votes being suppressed should be illegal votes. The rest of your statement about voter fraud is certainly valid.

[Lower Deck]

Voter ID laws are intended to ensure that only bona fide voters cast ballots and only one time.

So they say.

[Cliff Dweller]

Why not institute what is used in third world nations... Indelible ink on the finger.

Simple, effective and if anyone has more than one purple finger, they go to jail and their vote is rescinded.

[Biggirl]

Rather ID laws were put in place to match the name with the voter. States do that via one having either a driver license of a picture ID. I feel very confortable when I present my ID when I go to vote because at least someone else did not steal my identity. The ID comes from the state DMV.

There are also other ways to do voter fraud which also includes machine and paper ballots.

[UCANSEE2]

Yup, it doesn't matter who votes as much as who counts the votes.

It is not WHO counts the votes, it is WHAT counts the votes.

That WHAT is a computer. It has no conscience and does what the program tells it to do.

It is not WHO counts the votes, it is WHO programmed the computer.

If one checks, one will find that the companies that participated in programming the computer are major donors to the Clinton Foundation.

[JimRed]

...their vote is rescinded.

Not possible to know how they voted, unless on provisional ballot, which only gets counted after it is verified.

[gogeo]

Voter ID laws are meant to suppress votes and not combat the kind of voter fraud that can turn elections...

Really. What voters are being suppressed?

[Sergio]

bkmk