Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WikiLeaks Publishes 23,035 Clinton E-mails Marked Classified When She Received Them
New American ^ | Tuesday, 26 July 2016 | C. Mitchell Shaw

Posted on 07/27/2016 2:15:09 PM PDT by Sopater

After spending more than a year denying — and avoiding indictment for — sending and receiving classified information over her unsecured, private e-mail server, Hillary Clinton still can’t shake the truth. Besides the DNC e-mails that are making waves in the news because they show that the Democratic National Committee violated its own rules to help Clinton win the Democrat presidential nomination, WikiLeaks also released a trove of leaked e-mails from Clinton’s server. Those e-mails prove irrefutably that Clinton sent and received information that was classified at the time.

After announcing last month that the next leak published by his organization would almost certainly lead to a Clinton indictment, Julian Assange has made good on his word. The leaked Clinton e-mails were released before the DNC e-mails, but got pushed aside in the news cycle when police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge were murdered as part of the war on police. With the news of the DNC leaks and Clinton’s assured nomination, the Clinton leaks need to be examined and considered.

The e-mails published by WikiLeaks — 23,035 in all — are all from her first year as secretary of state and are all marked “(C)” for “confidential” — a designation for classified information. Clinton held that office for another three years. Assuming her carelessness — and recalcitrance — continued throughout her tenure, she may well have sent and/or received almost 100,000 classified e-mails over her server during her time in office. It is difficult to imagine a greater threat to national security.

FBI Director James Comey may have attempted to sell the line that Clinton did not intend to break the law, but considering the size and scope of her mishandling of sensitive intelligence, it is more than a little hard to swallow what Comey was dishing out. Considering that the Justice Department has prosecuted people for far smaller infractions, it will be interesting to see if — now that the magnitude of Clinton’s crimes is known — Comey will continue to oppose her indictment.

Assange — with an obvious nod toward the irony involved — pointed out in an interview with ITV last month that the Obama administration has prosecuted a number of whistleblowers in recent years. WikiLeaks — which Assange started and continues to run while in exile — relies on whistleblowers, so his bias is easily understood.

While testifying before a House Oversight Committee, Comey was questioned about his assertion that Clinton did not know she was breaking the law because she did not know what a classified marking was. As The Hill reported, Comey answered:

“No, not that she would have no idea what a classified marking would be,” Comey responded. “It’s an interesting question whether she ... was actually sophisticated enough to understand what a C in [parentheses] means.”

“You asked me if I would assume someone would know,” he added. “Probably before this investigation, I would have. I am not so sure of that any longer. I think it’s possible — possible — that she didn’t know what a C meant when she saw it in the body of an email like that.”

While the too-stupid-to-know-it-was-criminal defense is not exactly new, it is hardly something one would expect on the resumé of a presidential candidate. Besides that, Comey was addressing 113 e-mails he says were classified. Now that it is known that at least 23,035 were marked as classified, perhaps Comey will offer the defense that he isn’t qualified for his post either.

Setting aside Comey’s asinine defense of Clinton’s criminal actions based on her supposed ignorance, the fact is that she was not ignorant. Clinton signed two non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) as part of her appointment as secretary of state. Those NDAs spelled out — in language clear enough to be understood even by someone who is not “sophisticated” — her responsibilities and obligations under the law. As this writer reported when the first of those two NDAs came to light:

The NDA signed by Mrs. Clinton on her second day as secretary of state spells out — in language so clear that the meaning of the word "is" is quite unambiguous — her responsibility in handling the sensitive information to which she would have access in her new job. One part reads, "I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI [Sensitive Compartmented Information] by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation." The agreement goes on to address how Secretary Clinton could be sure she was abiding by the letter and the spirit of the agreement. "I understand that it is my responsibility to consult with appropriate management authorities in the Department ... in order to ensure that I know whether information or material within my knowledge or control ... might be SCI," the NDA says.

These 23,035 e-mails were marked “(C),” and it was Clinton’s legal responsibility to recognize that. She is, after all, a graduate of law school and was licensed to practice law until 2002. If she truly is that ignorant of the law, should she be running for president?

Here, for example, are the first few paragraphs of one of the documents Clinton received via her unsecured, private e-mail server:

1. (U) This is a PRT Anbar cable.

2. (C) SUMMARY: Tension between the Iraqi Police and the judiciary was on display at the weekly Anbar Operations Command meeting covering security issues. Similar feelings were present at PRToffs meeting with Provincial Chief Judge Mohammed Al-Kubaisi. END SUMMARY.

3. (C) On February 22, PRToff attended the Anbar Operations Command (AOC) weekly security meeting at the Blue Diamond Iraqi Army facility. Staff Major General (sMG) Aziz, appearing vigorous and healthy, chaired the meeting for the first time since his medical treatment in Turkey. Provincial Chief of Police (PCOP) sMG Baha Al-Karkhi, Deputy Governor Hikmat Jasim Zaidan and Investigative Judge (IJ) Ghanim Al-Azawi were also present.

4. (C) The initial interchange at the meeting was characterized by the usual Iraqi Police (IP) complaints of judicial shortcomings and focused on the IP's inability to find an investigative judge over the weekend to approve warrants. Investigative Judge Ghanim responded that an IJ was always available and that police should "just knock on my door." He explained that CPA Administrator Paul Bremer had issued an order years earlier requiring a lawyer to be present at the initial appearance of a suspect and said the absence of a lawyer was the real impediment to prosecuting cases. sMG Aziz countered that this law was enacted a long time ago and that terrorist suspects should be treated differently from other criminals since theirs was a special crime against society. He asked that the laws be changed in order to allow detention of terror suspects without a warrant via a streamlined process. IJ Ghanim responded that the existing judicial process was sound and provided a good example of the rule of law to the citizenry.

This writer will admit to not being “sophisticated enough to understand” what much of this document discusses, but then this writer is not secretary of state and has not signed legal forms agreeing that "I understand that it is my responsibility to consult with appropriate management authorities in the Department ... in order to ensure that I know whether information or material within my knowledge or control ... might be” classified. Even with my lack of sophistication, though, a couple of things stand out to me. That “(C)” could only mean a handful of things: (1) It could denote the ordering of paragraphs. But since almost all of the paragraphs are labeled “(C),” that is probably not correct. (2) It could mean that that paragraph is protected by a copyright. Again, since the product of government can’t be copyrighted, that too, is probably not the right answer. (3) I should go ask one of the “appropriate management authorities in the Department” — preferably one who is sufficiently “sophisticated” — what it means just “to ensure that I know whether information or material within my knowledge or control ... might be” classified.

What secretary Clinton did, though was ignore that designation at least 23,035 times in her first year in office alone. And now, she’s running for president.

If Assange is correct and this leak leads to her indictment, it may be that Judge Napolitano’s prediction from earlier this year will come true. At the end of a video about Clinton’s e-mail scandal, he asked, “Don't you want to know before your nominating process is complete if your likely nominee will be a criminal defendant in the Fall?”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016dncconvention; clinton; clintonemails; clintonrico; comeylies; comeyrico; democrats; dnclies; doj; email; fbi; fbilies; fbirico; govtabuse; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryemails; mediabias; noaccountability; treasonrico; trump; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-115 next last
Too little too late?
1 posted on 07/27/2016 2:15:09 PM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Has anybody gone to Comey for a statement on this?

Or has he already left the country?


2 posted on 07/27/2016 2:17:19 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Click for the “Shady Bunch”


“Comey went for .... peanuts.”

3 posted on 07/27/2016 2:18:23 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

But we have been told SO MANY TIMES that she had no classified emails, and she had no intent to break the rules. The MSM is all lining up to figure out how to brand this as evil by WikiLeaks instead of evil by Hillary, Comey, Lynch, and all who have been complicit in allowing her to remain unscathed by the email scandal.


4 posted on 07/27/2016 2:18:26 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The Next Attorney General can prosecute, since this one won’t.


5 posted on 07/27/2016 2:19:09 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

She deleted 33,000 emails.
Wikileaks has released 23,000 emails.

The 10,000 most devastating emails are still to come.


6 posted on 07/27/2016 2:19:16 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Comey, spokesperson of HSBC and the corrupted-FBI,
belongs in prison for LYING TO AMERICA.


7 posted on 07/27/2016 2:20:17 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Has anybody gone to Comey for a statement on this?

Too late. Justice has left the building.

8 posted on 07/27/2016 2:20:35 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ("Come back David Dewhurst; all is forgiven!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

And one of the Hillary campaign ads that we swing-staters have to suffer though on a regular basis is that Trump is not trustworthy on foreign policy issues and that Hillary is. I guess we all should pretend that these emails don’t exist and that Trump is the real foreign policy screw-up.


9 posted on 07/27/2016 2:20:44 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

What a douchebag she is.


10 posted on 07/27/2016 2:21:08 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Fire Lynch and close the injustice department.

Fire Comey and close the FBI.

Fire everyone in the IRS and close it.

Hire Wikileaks to get criminal evidence and present it to America and grand juries.

Use the $avings from above to help fund Veteran care.


11 posted on 07/27/2016 2:23:00 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Nothing special re words "radical Islam"!, Nation of IsIam is just "Islam." NOI/ISIS equals murder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Trump needs to start demanding resignations: Comey and Lynch to begin with.


12 posted on 07/27/2016 2:23:22 PM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

These are the Emails released by the State Dept, not hacked


13 posted on 07/27/2016 2:24:11 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Wowie! That’s bound to leave a stain.


14 posted on 07/27/2016 2:24:34 PM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The Next Attorney General can prosecute, since this one won’t.

PARDONMAGEDDON. January 19, 2017. No one is getting prosecuted here.


15 posted on 07/27/2016 2:24:42 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Comey needs to pull an “Admiral Boorda”.


16 posted on 07/27/2016 2:24:52 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Hillary Clinton is a felon. As yet unindicted, but a felon nonetheless ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

17 posted on 07/27/2016 2:25:19 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Waited ‘til she was officially nominated. She hasn’t accepted, yet ... maybe she will have a come-to-allah moment and appoint slow Joe in her place. /s


18 posted on 07/27/2016 2:25:21 PM PDT by ri4dc (Trump is with me. I am sensing a landslide in the making. MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
The leaked Clinton e-mails were released before the DNC e-mails, but got pushed aside in the news cycle when police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge were murdered as part of the war on police.

Now THIS is HIGHLY disturbing.

19 posted on 07/27/2016 2:25:42 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I remember a time when the media went non stop about how W was unfit for office because he got a DUI 40 years ago.


20 posted on 07/27/2016 2:26:26 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
The only way to indict Hillary Clinton is to impeach the current Attorney General and then every one Obama appoints after that until he runs out of liberal lawyers to appoint.

Don't think we have time for that.
21 posted on 07/27/2016 2:26:36 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Yeah, and tonight’s theme at her convention is... Wait for it... National security.

Hillary couldn’t guard a birdbath.


22 posted on 07/27/2016 2:26:44 PM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muggs

ping


23 posted on 07/27/2016 2:27:02 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

How could she have done the job without classified info? The media never ask...


24 posted on 07/27/2016 2:27:30 PM PDT by Son House (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; the Original Legislative Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger
These are the Emails released by the State Dept, not hacked

No, they're released by Wikileaks.

Read the article.

25 posted on 07/27/2016 2:27:49 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

(Chortle, chortle)


26 posted on 07/27/2016 2:28:32 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If this is all Assange has it damages Hillary but does not utterly destroy her. If he had unrestricted access to her not so secure private server, then no doubt there are even more revealing e mails regarding her relationship with Mrs. Weiner and others. Hunch is Assange is aggrieved that he has not received the pardon he needs and feels he deserves from his fellow progressives in the White House.If he received the information from the Russians it may be all he has. The Russians used Assange to put Hillary on notice that they can prevent her election or if she is elected control her behavior as President.They have many other venues other than Assange to release any other information they have and choose to make public. Throughout recorded history being privy to information has been used to control people. Ironic that it is the Russians who are helping Obama live up to his promise that his administration would be the “most transparent in history”.


27 posted on 07/27/2016 2:29:07 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

A couple of questions.

Are some of these emails that the FBI was not able to find? Emails that were not part of the FBI investigation?

Do some of these emails contain sensitive information that was redacted by the government but is available in these releases?


28 posted on 07/27/2016 2:29:08 PM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Has anyone introduced a bill of impeachment since this came out today?

If not, then why the delay?

It needs to be done before they adjourn the convention.


29 posted on 07/27/2016 2:29:25 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

<~Reptilliary just thought (C) meant Copyright. Easy to mistake it for ©.


30 posted on 07/27/2016 2:29:28 PM PDT by goldbux (When you're odd the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Hillary couldn’t guard a birdbath.

No, but she could sell it to the highest bidder while simultaneously giving it national monument status and putting a plaque on it in dedication to poor black women.

31 posted on 07/27/2016 2:29:51 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“No, they’re released by Wikileaks.”
Wikileaks posted them but they were released by State Dept with redactions, they put them up a couple of weeks ago


32 posted on 07/27/2016 2:31:49 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Did they discover any of those “yoga” e-mails?


33 posted on 07/27/2016 2:32:22 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The Obama administration is so transparent that I can see corruption from the top and all the way to the bottom.


34 posted on 07/27/2016 2:32:57 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.


35 posted on 07/27/2016 2:33:16 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

HUMA = "What's wrong babe.. Thinking about where my lips have been again?"

36 posted on 07/27/2016 2:33:34 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater; tet68; armydawg505; skinkinthegrass; onedoug; 2ndDivisionVet; ConorMacNessa; NKP_Vet; ...

I guess that the “Smartest woman in the world” should have enlisted in the Marine Corps; then she would have learned that (C) at the beginning of a paragraph means it is CLASSIFIED as CONFIDENTIAL. Of course, the same “Smartest woman in the world” should have been able to remember her security briefing that she received after becoming Secretary of State. But then, she is also a “blond” with all of its “ditsy” attributes; which her DNC and MSM supporters will probably raise as her defense. “But what matter does it make at this date?”


37 posted on 07/27/2016 2:33:42 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger
“No, they’re released by Wikileaks.” Wikileaks posted them but they were released by State Dept with redactions, they put them up a couple of weeks ago

Where are you getting that?

38 posted on 07/27/2016 2:33:50 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

This is old news everybody, released by State Dept months ago


39 posted on 07/27/2016 2:35:15 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Ah Weiner there. Let’s see. DT called him a sleezbag pervert at his Presser today. Lol.


40 posted on 07/27/2016 2:35:28 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If these are classified they should NOT be publicly released. Congress ONLY. So it seems the State Dept. wants to SCREW America all it can by publicly disclosing classified information?


41 posted on 07/27/2016 2:35:48 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“Where are you getting that?”

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/


42 posted on 07/27/2016 2:36:06 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

They are redacted


43 posted on 07/27/2016 2:36:44 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Let me know when the “journolists” put out story after story.


44 posted on 07/27/2016 2:36:57 PM PDT by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

obviously hillary should have been interrogated on her knowledge of classified emails, Comey shouldn’t have to guess, this shows a complete farce of an interview of hillary.

“You asked me if I would assume someone would know,” he added. “Probably before this investigation, I would have. I am not so sure of that any longer. I think it’s possible — possible — that she didn’t know what a C meant when she saw it in the body of an email like that.”


45 posted on 07/27/2016 2:36:59 PM PDT by rolling_stone (our founders are rolling over in their graves, and yelling 2nd amendment when all else fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Son House
How could she have done the job without classified info? The media never ask...

A logical question. Based on my short military experience and handling of some classified correspondence, I'd bet most every official communication of a S of S would be classified at least "Confidential".

And that practically all of the emails discussed here were classified seems to support that.

Terrible reporting on this subject from the beginning of the story months ago.

46 posted on 07/27/2016 2:38:35 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger

Are you sure? I have looked at several such as an IAEA email about Syria and nothing is blacked out!


47 posted on 07/27/2016 2:39:07 PM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st

“Are you sure? I have looked at several such as an IAEA email about Syria and nothing is blacked out!”
These docs are the result of a FOIA, anything classified was withheld or redacted.


48 posted on 07/27/2016 2:41:20 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The narrative will be — if they bother to comment at all — that ‘(C) Confidential’ is just a Mickey Mouse classification, not something really serious. No big deal.

Oh, how I hate these people...


49 posted on 07/27/2016 2:43:07 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (Hey, what happened to my clever tag line?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Just took a look at the website, searched titles for (C) and the results are astounding. There is no way she can rely on not knowing what (C) stood for - examples show things such as:
Original Classification:CONFIDENTIAL Current Classification:CONFIDENTIAL

Further, in the content:
CLASSIFIED BY: RBlau, CDA, DOS, Am Embassy San Salvador; REASON:
1.4(D)

Thus - the emails clearly say they are classified and who classified them.

As others have suggested - it appears these 23,000 are likely from the 33,000 that were deleted to begin with.

It appears those sending simply had them addressed to the Secretary of State - so don’t know if they knew the actual email address behind the short title. Whoever enabled direction of such emails to her private server email address should definitely be prosecuted for enabling these violations - and should tell the truth about who directed their actions.


50 posted on 07/27/2016 2:43:36 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson