Posted on 06/14/2016 4:31:31 AM PDT by milton23
How many red flags does it take to see that Islamist-related terror is increasing?
In the past seven months there have been high-profile terror attacks in Paris, San Bernardino, Brussels, and in Orlando.
In the U.S. the number and frequency of Islamist plots has been growing. Before Orlando, the U.S. alone has been the target of at least 85 Islamist-related terrorist plots since Sept. 11, 2001.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...
And the imp and the witch are agreeing on more refugees to this country. No one takes them on, no one
Sorry, but we don’t need a commission.
We need a President to:
1: Bomb ISIS strongholds back to the Stone Age
2: Tell the Saudis that we will level their oil fields, flatten Mecca and Nuc the Kaaba if they don’t get a handle on the financing of these people.
We didn’t start it.... but we will put a stop to it!
The only value “commissions” have is income to the participants.
The only value “commissions” have is income to the participants.
And the prestige...and in that magic trick /illusion movie I saw a few years ago, I learned the “big trick” is called the prestige...how fitting!
Why have a commission? We still can’t read all of the findings of the 9/11 report.
No, we do not need another commission, we do not need to take elaborate steps such as creating another bureaucracy such as DHS, we do not need to go to war to find non-existent WMD’s.
We need firm decisive leadership. Stop the inflow of illegal immigrants. Put Hillary in jail. Impeach obama. Deport illegals. Resurrect the House Un-American Activities Committee to investigate disloyalty and subversive organizations.
Oh, wait a minute, it takes an opposition party to get this going. With our Uniparty system, it will never happen.
Unless we elect someone like Trump to turn it all back around again.
The old becomes new. This morning the theme has become “our agencies must communicate better.” Am I the only one who remembers this old line? Wasn’t that the reason behind creating DHS?
It’s just a delaying tactic to allow outrage to simmer down so the pols don’t have to do anything (but talk).
If there was such a thing as an enterprising young TV journalist, it would probably only take a couple of hours in the tape library to edit together a long string of pols saying exactly the same thing after previous attacks.
Maybe the Trump campaign can do a string of Hitlery’s greatest hits (wearing a different color pantsuit each time).
Another 9/11 commission? What for? The first one whitewashed any Clinton responsibility, led by that hack Jamie Gorelick and aided and abetted by Sandy Berger.
I remember them saying that line before that everyone needs to communicate better. This is a result of someone high up telling them not to communicate or do their jobs.
Have they even finished the Benghazi commission (show trial)
They are still at war with us.
We are still not at war with them.
******************
fubarACK onebigassmistakeamerica
Yes, we need yet ANOTHER commission, taking months and $$$$ that produces nothing but MORE govt. Anything of substance will be white-washed a/o deemed ‘classified’ from The People.
I, for one, have had enough dog-n-pony shows.
Another Commission? Why? Is there more whitewashing required?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.