Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump beats Clinton among veterans, new poll says
Stars and Stripes ^ | May 26, 2016 | Travis J. Tritten

Posted on 06/01/2016 4:19:50 PM PDT by Innovative

Donald Trump is ahead of presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton by 9 percentage points among veteran voters, according to a new national poll released Thursday.

The billionaire businessman drew 47 percent and Clinton garnered 38 percent of more than 1,600 respondents who had military experience or lived with someone who served, the May polling by the group Morning Consult found.

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; clinton; military; polls; trump; veterans; veteransvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Excellent. I just hope they will actually turn out and vote in the real election.
1 posted on 06/01/2016 4:19:50 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

In other news, bears “do their business” in the woods.


2 posted on 06/01/2016 4:22:00 PM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Well, Hillary did kill three Veterans.

Ambassador Chris Stevens wasn’t a Veteran, or it would have been four.


3 posted on 06/01/2016 4:22:11 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Anyone catch the There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party. (Or the GOPe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Ya think?

I personally regard any veteran who backs that lying feloness to be a traitor worth only an extended middle finger.


4 posted on 06/01/2016 4:22:16 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

WOW!!!!

This is despite all the B.S. trying to “prove” that Trump did not raise money for veterans!

REAL Vets know the truth—who’s on their side and who’s trying to scam them!!!!


5 posted on 06/01/2016 4:34:40 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
I just hope they will actually turn out and vote in the real election.

THEY will show up, but will their ballots show up where they are supposed to go or will they show up 6 months after the inauguration?

6 posted on 06/01/2016 4:36:32 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Don't call them Daesh OR ISIS or ISIL, they are always "ISLAMIC State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Pee Wee Herman would beat Clinton among veterans.


7 posted on 06/01/2016 4:40:02 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (The reason for Gun Control has always been Government's Fear of Rebellion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Well there goes the Clintons, they said that Trump didn’t raise money for the Vets, yet they are behind Trump all the way...you don’t think the Clintons lied about all this do you? /s


8 posted on 06/01/2016 4:44:33 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

And Obama just dissed VFW halls as being dens of ignorance - that’s gonna hopefully rub off on Hillary.


9 posted on 06/01/2016 4:55:50 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
"Clinton garnered 38 percent of more than 1,600 respondents who had military experience *or lived with someone who served*"

THAT'S why the numbers are even in the 38% range for Hillary.

Actual veterans, and even todays "PC" armed forces HATE democrats.

Because they know, no matter what that, liberal Presidents will always stab them in the back.

"People who lived with them"= women, generally, who trend strongly dem.

Honestly, I don't personally know one male veteran who is a liberal.

Do they exist? Sure.

John Kerry, Norman Lear for example.

But I don't know those guys.

They might be OK with some liberal positions, but a full-throated liberal? No.

10 posted on 06/01/2016 4:58:44 PM PDT by boop ("A Republic, if you can keep it."-Franklin, 1787. "We couldn't keep it"-America, 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

How the hell did Clinton get 38%
Not very encouraging at all


11 posted on 06/01/2016 4:59:07 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“..or lived with those that served.” Talk about expanded criteria. They had to add non-veterans to get Hillary within 9 percentage points.


12 posted on 06/01/2016 5:01:23 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Yeah...I’m actually surprised it was that close....


13 posted on 06/01/2016 5:08:40 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

That’s where it probably came from...You’re right...


14 posted on 06/01/2016 5:09:32 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Only 9%?

It’s the right direction, but surprisingly low, IMHO.


15 posted on 06/01/2016 5:10:49 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
...or lived with somebody who served.

Was wondering why it was only 9 points.

16 posted on 06/01/2016 5:16:45 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Wow! This is just so “unexpected”!


17 posted on 06/01/2016 5:18:00 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It’s good news for Trump if that 38% for Clinton is accurate and it goes now higher for her with him carrying the rest. If he’s only 9 points up over Clinton in the end he will be greatly underperforming the percentage Republicans normally get.


18 posted on 06/01/2016 5:37:00 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

Ah...didn’t catch that part. That would make a difference.


19 posted on 06/01/2016 5:37:30 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I seriously doubt those numbers. I’m wired into a lot of fellow veterans. We are 100 percent against. Something in the fine print will expose this fraudulent poll. Guaranteed.


20 posted on 06/01/2016 6:12:37 PM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson