Skip to comments.
Trump University Plaintiff Law Firm Paid Clintons $450,000 for Speeches
American Spectator ^
| Jeffrey Lord
Posted on 06/01/2016 8:54:46 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
One of the law firms picked by the Judge in the Trump University case — the very Judge Donald Trump accuses by name of anti-Trump bias — awarded this firm the case after — say again after — Hillary and Bill Clinton had been paid a cool $450,000 for two speeches by the firm.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; albertogonzales; clinton; clintoncrimefamily; election2016; gonzalocuriel; laraza; newyork; presidentdonaldtrump; trump; trumpuniversity; whataretheirfrnicks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Short article...short excerpt.
To: hoosiermama; onyx; Jane Long; V K Lee; RitaOK; Black Agnes; nopardons; PennsylvaniaMom; Fai Mao; ...
To: RoosterRedux
Why would any law firm need to pay for speeches?
3
posted on
06/01/2016 8:56:16 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Sounds like they bribed the judge (by paying his candidate) in order to be named as the firm representing this class action lawsuit.
Standard Clinton pay-to-play.
To: RoosterRedux; GilGil
5
posted on
06/01/2016 8:59:03 AM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: RoosterRedux
Trump’s cabinet is going to be SO effective !
6
posted on
06/01/2016 9:02:22 AM PDT
by
knarf
To: RoosterRedux
Sounds to me that Trump has good grounds for a JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT SUIT if the judge fails to recuse himself!
7
posted on
06/01/2016 9:04:42 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
To: RoosterRedux
A cartoon lawsuit employed by the Clinton tactical machine.
8
posted on
06/01/2016 9:09:32 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey. Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming-- infinitum.)
To: combat_boots
Thx. I did a search but didn’t turn up anything. It figures that the Conservative Treehouse would be on top of this matter ASAP.
To: RoosterRedux
The MSM will NOT care about this story...
10
posted on
06/01/2016 9:24:16 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(When Hillarys Foundation gets a million only $30K goes to charity. Where's the effing press outrage?)
To: RoosterRedux
Shows you how dirty the Clinton “mafia” crime family really is...they would go to any lengths to put this evil, vile, spawn of satan in to run this country...
Foreign Countries are all ‘owned ‘ by her so therefore, people have to do what they are told: Vince Foster ring a bell???
11
posted on
06/01/2016 9:28:09 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
To: BenLurkin
Why would any law firm need to pay for speeches? Why would any organization pay over $200000 for one speech by anyone?
There has to be more to it than the actual content of the speech.
Corruption as usual-nothing to see here-move along...
13
posted on
06/01/2016 10:02:41 AM PDT
by
TnTnTn
To: wideminded
I looked it up...between 2001 and the end of 2015...Hillary and Bill Clinton got paid 153 million for speeches.
All of this....went to the Clinton Foundation, and thus would appear as some charity type operation.
I can’t imagine what exactly you’d get out of a speech from either one, but I’d say that about Bush, Powell, or any of the Washington elite.
To: RoosterRedux
The Clinton’s have no idea who they’re up against. Trump will be thinking of ways to get back at them. They’re despicable.
It shows you how no other candidate would dare stand up to them, like he has already.
15
posted on
06/01/2016 10:18:15 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(The Golden Age of Pericles is about to begin again... in America)
To: RoosterRedux
Hillary and Bill Clinton had been paid a cool $450,000 for two speeches by the firmSome ambiguity here. From the wording we do not really know who gave the speeches, the firm or the Clintons. Most would assume that, contrary to the actual words, The Clintons made the speeches but one has to read the article to be sure of that. The headline says that the firm paid for two speeches that the firm gave.
16
posted on
06/01/2016 10:46:15 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberali soli o feccia.)
To: arthurus
Does anyone have a transcript of these “speeches”? Or at least, does anyone know what was said? What total corruption.
17
posted on
06/01/2016 10:54:23 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: hal ogen
The Clintons’ speeches are all on the order of State Secrets and may not be divulged any more than Hussein’s birth record or any other records of Barak Hussein may be divulged. I suppose it is contrary to Sharia or something.
18
posted on
06/01/2016 11:00:34 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberalsoli o feccia.)
To: RoosterRedux
19
posted on
06/01/2016 11:27:03 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: HarleyLady27
The Clinton Crime Syndicate has cranked up the personal destruction machine as of Tuesday.
Podesta the scumball has given the green light because Hillary is floundering.
20
posted on
06/01/2016 11:51:46 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson