Posted on 05/25/2016 11:00:17 PM PDT by vannrox
In a February post titled, It’s Not Just the GOP – The Democratic Party is Also Imploding, I noted the following:
Yes, of course, Trump winning the GOP nomination marks the end of the party as we know it. After all, some neocons are already publicly and actively throwing their support behind Hillary. While this undoubtably represents a major turning point in U.S. political history, many pundits have yet to appreciate that the exact same thing is happening within the Democratic Party. It’s just not completely obvious yet.
While it might sound strange, a coronation of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary will mark the end of the party as we know it. There’s been a lot written about the “Sanders surge,” with much of it revolving around Hillary Clinton’s extreme personal weakness as a candidate. While this is indisputable, it’s also a convenient way for the status quo to exempt itself from fault and discount genuine grassroots anger. I’m of the view that Sanders’ support is more about people liking him than them disliking Hillary, particularly when it comes to registered Democrats. He’s not merely seen as the “least bad choice.” People really do like him.
The Sanders appeal is twofold. He is seen as unusually honest and consistent for someone who’s held elected office for much of his life, plus he advocates a refreshingly anti-establishment view on core issues that matter to an increasing number of Americans. These include militarism, Wall Street bailouts, a two-tiered justice system, the prohibitive cost of college education, healthcare insecurity and a “rigged economy.” While Hillary is being forced to pay lip service to these issues, everybody knows she doesn’t mean a word of it. She means it less than Obama meant it in 2008, and Obama really didn’t mean it.
Hillary is the embodiment of a sick and detested status quo. She stands for nothing, is nothing, and a vote for her all but guarantees both murder abroad and oligarchy at home. I think a large number of Bernie Sanders supporters understand this and won’t be going off silently into that quiet voting booth to commit ethical self-sacrifice despite the terrifying prospects of a Trump presidency. I think they’ll stay home, but they won’t sit there passively. They’ll be seething inside, and many will renounce the Democratic party forever. Many rank and file Republicans already came to such a conclusion years ago, which is precisely why the nomination was wide open for a man like Trump to capture. Democrats will do the same, and before you know it, political pundits will be tripping over each other to write about the death of the Democratic Party. Fast forward three months, and the evidence of this reality is starting to flood in. As I’ve maintained for what seems like forever, a very significant percentage of Bernie Sanders supporters will not go quietly into that corrupt, neocon Hillary Clinton night. People have seen enough. They’ve had enough.
The latest proof come to us via New York Daily News columnist Shaun King. What he writes isn’t particularly earth-shattering or novel, but it carries weight for me due to Mr. King’s political history. As he shares with readers in his latest post, Here’s Why I’m Leaving the Democratic Party After This Presidential Election and You Should Too:
Right now, the Democratic Party, which I have called home my entire life, is deeply in love with money. Consequently, its leaders have supported and advanced all kinds of evil, big and small, in devotion to this love affair.
My sweet mother, who worked in a scorching hot light bulb factory for over 40 years of her life, introduced me to the party. While I’m not so sure it was ever really true, she taught me that Democrats were for the poor and working class of America. We waffled between those two groups ourselves, so for me, I chose to be a part of the party that represented us.
As a senior in high school, I attended my first political rally in 1996 as President Bill Clinton spoke at the University of Kentucky in his reelection bid. He was amazing.
In 1999, Atlanta’s first black mayor, Maynard Jackson, whom I loved and revered, recruited me to campaign for Al Gore and encouraged me to get involved with the party. As student government president at Morehouse College, I spoke at campaign events alongside Vice President Gore and his family and fought hard as hell for him to win. How he lost stung as much as the fact that he lost. He goes on to describe a personal love affair with candidate Barack Obama. So this is a guy who bled Democratic blue his entire life — until now. Faced with an undeniably rigged and dangerously corrupt system, Mr. King came to see Senator Sanders as a true champion of reform, and Hillary Clinton as a disingenuous creature of a discredited status quo. As such, he “felt the Bern,” and proceeded to see the establishment of the party he grew up with act like a bunch of shady villainous thieves.
He explains:
“For the most part, they (the lobbyists) said, the DNC has returned to business as usual, pre-2008. The DNC has even named a finance director specifically for PAC donations who has recently emailed prospective donors to let them know that they can now contribute again, according to an email that was reviewed by The Washington Post.”
Campaign watchdog groups were furious. This is a disgusting and unnecessary reversion, but it gives us a real clue into how the Democratic Party sincerely sees money in politics. They love it. They certainly didn’t do this for Bernie Sanders. His campaign does not accept donations from SuperPACs or lobbyists and he’s won 21 primaries and caucuses without it. The Clinton campaign, on the other hand, is awash in this type of money.
In essence, Hillary Clinton and the DNC each wants us to believe that lobbyists and SuperPACs don’t expect anything from them in return for their money. This is the most basic, foolish, offensive lie they could ever tell. Of course they want something in return. That’s the business they’re in.
On April 18, the Sanders campaign wrote an open letter declaring that Clinton’s campaign was violating campaign finance laws through an unethical joint arrangement with the DNC. The Clinton campaign’s response was that she was actually raising money for down-ticket Democrats. Two weeks later, though, Politico released an amazing investigative report which found that out of the $61 million the Clinton campaign was raising for state parties, the parties were only allowed to keep 1% of it. You read that correctly. I’ll spell it out so that you know a digit wasn’t missing. They got to keep one percent of the funds she claimed she raised for them.
It appears to be a money laundering scheme. Do you remember when George Clooney said that Bernie Sanders and his supporters were right to be disgusted by the fact that some seats at the fundraiser cost $353,400 per couple, but that he could live with it because the money was mainly going to help smaller candidates win local elections?
He was wrong.
The thing is, though, the Democratic Party isn’t really very democratic. It’s sincerely just a machine for Hillary Clinton. This isn’t just “sour grapes,” as Clinton surrogates contemptuously claim. This a genuine and painful admission from a critical thinking American citizen that the game is nothing more than a rigged sham.
We’ve all had such moments. I’m sure everyone reading this can recall precisely what event it was that “woke them up” to the false reality peddled to us by the mainstream media, politicians and corporate lobbyists (feel free to share your personal stories in the comment section). For me, it was the crisis of 2008 and its aftermath. It affected me so deeply, I quit my Wall Street job and within a year had moved from the place of my birth, New York City to Colorado. That’s what “waking up” does to you. It hits you so hard, you can never see the world the same way again. You might still be stuck in that same soul crushing job or geography for reasons beyond your control, but your perspective is forever changed.
For Shaun King and many other lifelong Democrats, 2016 is their year of waking up. It took Clinton vs. Sanders to shake them out of their slumber and admit the very troubling state of the Republic. It doesn’t matter when someone wakes up, what matters is that it happened and is happening.
To prove the point, read Shaun King’s closing paragraphs:
Whatever happens between now and the Democratic Convention – what’s next is that we form a brand new progressive political party from scratch. It has never been more clear to me that millions and millions of us do not belong in the Democratic Party. Their values are not our values. Their priorities are not our priorities. And I’ll be honest with you, I think too highly of myself, of my family, of my friends, and of our future, to stick with a party that looks anything like what Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman Schultz are leading right now.
Clinton’s refusal to release the transcripts of her speeches to Goldman Sachs was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me. Her indignant and irrational excuses made no sense — particularly in light of the reports stating that the transcripts would ruin her campaign and made her sound like an executive at the company.
I’ll start where I left off — the root of all of this is the love of money. In this campaign, Bernie Sanders, with a ragtag group of misfits, proved to the world that another way exists. He has created a blueprint for us on how we build a political movement without the money from billionaire class and their special interests. In my heart, I believe we are on the brink of something very special. It isn’t going to be the presidency of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump either. It’s going to be what those of us who’ve seen a better way do next.
Don’t believe what anyone tells you — the ball is in our hand and we have more power than progressive people have had in a very long time in this country. I will fight for Bernie Sanders until he is no longer running for president.
After that, this will be my last election as a Democrat. I’m moving on and hope you do, too. These aren’t the words of a man simply blowing off some steam. He isn’t a Bernie supporter who’s about to swap bumper stickers and start groveling to the plutocratic, neocon war criminal that is Hillary Clinton. He’s a man who sees the problem for what it, and bore witness to what happens to society when you continue to accept the “lesser of two evils” for multiple decades.
Shaun King and I probably disagree on most issues, and that’s ok. I’m not about telling everybody I know best and that everyone else is wrong. I’ve been wrong enough to know better. Rather, I’m about open dialogue, the rule of law and an equal playing field. I want a nation of courageous, independent, generous and informed citizens, as opposed to a nation of slobbering, submissive sheep. There’s nothing more offensive to me than the latter.
It’s important to understand that being a sheep has nothing to do with money or status. My life was overflowing with both back in 2009 when I voluntarily left the finance industry at the height of my Wall Street career. I was on the fastest track possible, yet when I looked at myself in the mirror I saw a sheep. Being a sheep is state of mind and nothing more. Shaun King appears to be done being a sheep. Let’s hope tens of millions more follow his lead.
Enough is enough.
I think a guy who was a regular Democrat voter in the 1970s...probably is standing there today and just shaking his head because it is a party mostly tied to twenty agenda items which half of them simply aren’t what the typical Democrat would support.
Take up gun talk. If you talk to a dozen Democrats over the age of 50...at least ten probably own a gun and don’t really want any changes done to the current rules of their state.
Go talk about taxation, and most will whine that they’ve worked hard to get to where they are at age fifty, and don’t understand where the tax money is being spent.
Go bring up college costs with a 50-year old Democrat who has a kid or two lined up for college....they will talk mostly like a Republican.
I won’t say it’s a singular problem because half of the Republicans over the age of fifty are fed up with their party as well. Same issues.
My father was a Democrat. He died in 1971. I seriously doubt he would be a Democrat today.
And yet the author thinks Gore was a squeaky clean wonderful candidate. The author should do some studies into the “green” money Gore has been stealing hand over fist.
Interesting to read about this guy's spiritual awakening. Quit his job and moved to the country. It sometimes happens to people where it turns out everything you think you knew is wrong. It's a sign of mental health to recognize the need for personal change and to do something about it.
Don’t believe what anyone tells you — the ball is in our hand and we have more power than progressive people have had in a very long time in this country. I will fight for Bernie Sanders until he is no longer running for president.
But I think he's making the same mistake all over again if he thinks "progressive" ideology is going to save the day. Progressive equals Marxism. Its a sad fact that as virulent marxism was dying off in the old Soviet Union, it found a new home in the United States. Hard to believe after Venezuela that anybody thinks leftwing-ism is still a good idea.
It isn’t going to be the presidency of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump either. It’s going to be what those of us who’ve seen a better way do next.
I hate to break it to him but it is going to the presidency of Donald Trump because we've already found a better way. Take a serious look at what socialism has done for Venezuela and ask yourself if that's what you want here because that's EXACTLY what you'll get.
Trump's going to be the next president. Get used to it.
Judging by the rest of the article, I fail to understand what the author finds terrifying about the prospect of a Trump presidency. Trump is the first candidate in a long time who speaks for the people, and is not a political power-broker. What I take from this is that the author is heavily swayed and influenced by the MSM. The MSM does not use facts or logic, it creates a narrative around feelings. They want to condition people to feel bad feelings whenever they hear the name of a conservative (any conservative), and to feel warm and fuzzy feelings whenever they hear the name of a radical left progressive (the more extremist and stupid, the better, like Wasserman-Schulz). If you fall for emotional manipulation and fail to think critically, you are the perfect Democrat voter.
My sweet mother...taught me that Democrats were for the poor and working class of America. We waffled between those two groups ourselves, so for me, I chose to be a part of the party that represented us.
Hint: the Democrat party has NEVER represented the poor or working class people of America. They have always been about empowering themselves at the expense of everyone else. Their tactic has always been to lie to and manipulate their target voters--they say they care, they try to make you terrified of anyone but them winning the election.
As a senior in high school, I attended my first political rally in 1996 as President Bill Clinton spoke at the University of Kentucky in his reelection bid. He was amazing.
How ironic. For me, Bill Clinton was the turning point, the point when I realized that the Democrat party does not represent the people and that I could never again vote Democrat. When Bill Clinton the corrupt megalomaniac was the Democrat party's offering, I went and registered with a political party for the first time ever.
The thing is, though, the Democratic Party isn’t really very democratic. It’s sincerely just a machine for Hillary Clinton. This isn’t just “sour grapes,” as Clinton surrogates contemptuously claim. This a genuine and painful admission from a critical thinking American citizen that the game is nothing more than a rigged sham.
Seeing the Democrat party for what it is is an important first step. It has always been a vehicle for power for the self-proclaimed elites.
Whatever happens between now and the Democratic Convention – what’s next is that we form a brand new progressive political party from scratch. It has never been more clear to me that millions and millions of us do not belong in the Democratic Party. Their values are not our values. Their priorities are not our priorities.
However, the author clearly remains misguided. The progressives-aka Communists--are even more nakedly after the power than the Democrats. The major difference is that the Democrats hide their lust for power and pretend that they actually care; progressives openly grab the power. The thing to remember is that any politician who promises to "take care of you" is really saying he wants to control every aspect of your life.
The author of this piece has made some progress in recognizing what the Democrat party really is, but he has a long way to go in becoming politically astute.
On the one side, the middle class and working class. On the other, the welfare class, the oligarchs who rely on crony capitalism and government support to make their money and keep down outsiders.
Trump has positioned himself on the side of the people who work for a living. Hillary, on the side of the rest.
“The US will soon be divided between those who work for a living, and those who don’t.”
That already happened; Romney alluded to it with the 47% comment. For the time being, low-wage earners are aligned with the non-working (in the hopes of bargaining for a better deal).
My father in law is a die hard democrat even though every single policy or stance is contrary to his faith. But the union tells him to vote dim and he does whatever the union tells him to do. It is his god.
“plutocratic, neocon war criminal that is Hillary Clinton.”
+1
Die, you stink’n corrupt, criminal political syndicates. We don’t want the old, stiff political elite donor and greedy pol class anymore or their stink’n money and we don’t want them around anymore. New media means of communication have brought with it knowledge. Thank God for the Internet. The people have finally figured it out on their own and found their voice. As Trump has proven, getting elected today essentially boils down to the effective use of new media sources, being sincere, highly motivated, and effectively communicating a common sense message of governing.
He’s wrong on one major point. The only part of the GOP that is imploding is a few neocon douchebags in D.C. and NYC. That’s it. Everyone else is aboard the train.
The DNC in the meantime is slow release time bomb going off as we watch.
Bill Clinton was my turning point as well when I figured out he and others were in the business if picking winners and losers. Usually it was the hard-working people who obeyed the law were the losers.
The term NeoCon is thrown around a lot these days. It generally is a blanket derisive term. Originally it was attributed to a group of people that were lead by Irving Kristol and Richard Perle and Dick Cheney. Many of these neocons were FDR new deal Democrats in the 30’s and some were even considered socialists and communists and Democrats. During the 60’s many of these became disaffected with the Democrat party because of LBJ’s massive expansion of the welfare state. The 60’s is the start of the last major realignment in politics. When Nixon courted the disaffected Democrats (the silent majority) and then the Reagan Democrats of the 80’s. We may be experiencing another paradigm realignment shift in politics today.
All the above being said, the thing that separates out these neocons for derision is the decision to go into the Iraq War. I joined shortly after the Vietnam war when I believe the Military was at one of it’s lowest points. In essence, I signed up when it wasn’t “cool” to be a Marine. I had many in my high school class questioning why I wanted to join and be a bullet stopper instead of going to college. Now, the young men and women that join are usually recognized during their graduation, as it should be. Being a lifelong military man, foreign policy has a special place in my heart. If being a neocon today means that you believe in a strong military and pursuing national security that is in America’s interest then I guess I’m a neocon. I don’t want to rehash this conversation, but I believe that the Iraq war was in America’s national interests. While I don’t support a lot of the stupid foreign policy adventures like being in Libya, Somalia or Kosovo in the 90’s, by and large we get it right. Many on here wanted us out of Iraq and look what that’s gotten us. I think everyone can agree that if we left a residual force of 10,000 in Iraq (not fighting mind you, but like we have in South Korea), there would be no ISIS in Iraq today. Again, if that’s being a neocon and not conservative, then maybe I will find myself shifting alignments. While I will pull the lever for Trump over Hillary any day of the week and twice on Sunday, I find myself with a lot of different opinions than Trump has. If Bernie and Trump debate as might now happen, it will be interesting to hear them talk about foreign policy.
My father was a big union guy. Clinton turned him into a Republican. Not so much because of his policies(though he abhors abortion), but because of what a low life scum he is. He detests Obama and Hillary too.
For the longest time, the American Left did an outstanding job HIDING their extremist, kooky beliefs.
Now they have exposed themselves and as expected, America is rejecting them.....pass the popcorn.
Reminds me of what happened when many of us realized the GOPe was NOT our friend... and didn’t carry our ethics or dreams.
Just another communist writer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.