Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why George Washington Would Have Agreed With Donald Trump
politico.com ^ | May 05, 2016 | MICHAEL HIRSH

Posted on 05/09/2016 10:31:26 PM PDT by Trumpinator

Why George Washington Would Have Agreed With Donald Trump

Watch Out, Hillary: The Founding Fathers would have loved “America First,” and they might have been right.

By Michael Hirsh

May 05, 2016

In his big foreign-policy rollout speech last week, Trump declared it was time “to shake the rust off of America’s foreign policy” and drop American pretensions about remaking the world in our image any longer. Or as he put it, in an obvious reference to the failed invasion of Iraq and intervention in Libya, America should abandon the “dangerous idea that we could make Western democracies out of countries that had no experience or interest in becoming a Western democracy.” Brazenly calling his agenda “America First”—never mind that was the name of the notorious pre-World War II isolationist movement—he also directly challenged the 70 years of bipartisan consensus over the post-World War II global order that America created. He suggested that the world needs America far more than the other way around, and he effectively warned U.S. allies that without a new global deal that demands a kind of tribute paid to Washington for its defense umbrella—he wants them to “prove” they are our friends, he says—he’d walk away from the world’s trade table, so to speak. “We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism,” Trump said. “The nation-state remains the true foundation for happiness and harmony. I am skeptical of international unions that tie us up and bring America down.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: trump
Globalism is anti conservative and anti American and that includes the anti-American idea of "free trade".

http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/early-republic/resources/hamilton%E2%80%99s-report-subject-manufactures-1791

Hamilton’s Report on the Subject of Manufactures, 1791

1 posted on 05/09/2016 10:31:26 PM PDT by Trumpinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

2 posted on 05/09/2016 10:34:14 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie; Trumpinator; All

Except Trump who probably owns control of more public bathrooms than all other Presidential candidates combined, has said “It has not been a problem.”


3 posted on 05/10/2016 12:28:02 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

Oh Glenn won’t like this


4 posted on 05/10/2016 12:51:31 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

And it hadn’t been until folks started passing laws that then allowed courts to get involved

Be careful what you wish for


5 posted on 05/10/2016 12:53:05 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

One look at contemporary America and George Washington would have sh*t himself.


6 posted on 05/10/2016 4:09:30 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

brilliant....


7 posted on 05/10/2016 5:05:33 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
James Woods! Awesome. 😊
8 posted on 05/10/2016 7:57:26 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (God bless the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

That’s why we are probably way far gone as a culture. I buy that Target might have this policy for social justice reasons. But I don’t buy that from Trump. What, he doesn’t know if his women customers care if men use the women’s bathrooms in his buildings? If we are at the point where women really don’t care, we are pretty way far gone.

We’ll see if Target is hurt by this policy in a few moths or so. They will only be hurt if women actually care about this. They might not.

Freegards


9 posted on 05/10/2016 8:03:22 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson