Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

once Oregon became a state, the federal government lost a right to own land
inside the state’s borders, his attorney Lissa Casey wrote

*************

Does the article say what she is basing that conclusion on?


4 posted on 04/26/2016 1:39:16 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deport
Does the article say what she is basing that conclusion on?

There is usually some clause in the statehood grant that indicates this. I know this is the case here in CO, however, there is ALSO a clause that gives FedGov access and, unfortunately, jurisdiction, at least, on public lands.

7 posted on 04/26/2016 1:43:57 PM PDT by dware (I don't care what bathroom they use, as long as it's in the nuthouse, where they belong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: deport

“Defendant Ammon Bundy intends to provide evidence to the Court to prove lack of jurisdiction over the refuge property due to issues with title which are in conflict with the United States Constitution. Given the complexities of the evidence involved, it is not a simple legal argument that can be briefed and expedited for the Court,’’ Casey wrote. “Evidence must be taken, and witnesses will likely need to be called.


18 posted on 04/26/2016 2:42:00 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: deport
United States v. Oregon from 1935 is pertinent. Decision based on whether or not waters in the refuge were navigable when Oregon became a state.
19 posted on 04/26/2016 2:45:19 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson