Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
United States v. Oregon from 1935 is pertinent. Decision based on whether or not waters in the refuge were navigable when Oregon became a state.
19 posted on 04/26/2016 2:45:19 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Thanks. I was wondering what Bundy was basing his claim on since the feds own or claim a lot
of the western lands. I don't know which and where but it appears the courts will become involved.


23 posted on 04/26/2016 2:58:58 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Navigable waterway is another section of the US constitution the US does have authority on. The issue here is the Park, which is not covered under Section 8 paragraph 17.


30 posted on 04/26/2016 3:41:53 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Trump is for America First. Cruz is for America Last. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson