To: deport
United States v. Oregon from 1935 is pertinent. Decision based on whether or not waters in the refuge were navigable when Oregon became a state.
19 posted on
04/26/2016 2:45:19 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: BuckeyeTexan
Thanks. I was wondering what Bundy was basing his claim on since the feds own or claim a lot
of the western lands. I don't know which and where but it appears the courts will become involved.
23 posted on
04/26/2016 2:58:58 PM PDT by
deport
To: BuckeyeTexan
Navigable waterway is another section of the US constitution the US does have authority on. The issue here is the Park, which is not covered under Section 8 paragraph 17.
30 posted on
04/26/2016 3:41:53 PM PDT by
Mechanicos
(Trump is for America First. Cruz is for America Last. It's that simple.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson