“But because its the social isolation of a little girl over her father’s perfectly legal gun, liberal pukes like you see no problem.”
All the parents involved are acting within the law and within their rights.
Warren has a right to carry in the school and the other parents have the right to pull their children from the class.
If they are pulling their children from class without just cause under civil law, they comprise a conspiracy to defraud the rights and well-being of that little girl. So as you admit the father has the right to wear the gun, and there's been no violence or threats, where is their just cause?
Without just cause, the administrator has no right to wrongfully invoke isolation policies against an innocent little girl, and the parents should be denied their requests to collectively harm the little girl and sanctioned from further involvement with school policy because of their proven willingness to manipulate policy through fraud to harm children for political agenda reasons. Those parents should also be sued for conspiracy to harm this particular little girl, and the administrator should be fired, sued and jailed.
Although I must say, Mao would agree with your interpretation of what the law is to be used for. He followed your legal principles to legally murder a hundred million Chinese citizens.
You’re an idiot.
True, but that's not what happened...
The administration moved the class to another building, effectively negating the father's ability to carry and afford his daughter the protection he felt she's entitled to.
As a bonus, they've marginalized and isolated the young girl from her class.