Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Orleans City Council to consider 5 gun-control measures(DOH!)
nola.com ^ | 4/21/2016 | Ben Myers

Posted on 04/22/2016 8:55:12 AM PDT by rktman

The gun-control proposals that Mayor Mitch Landrieu will publicly announce on Friday (April 22) include restrictions on who can carry guns, as well as the places and manner in which guns can be carried. The measures would also outlaw guns without serial numbers and require gun-theft victims to notify police within 48 hours, according to a draft ordinance.

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; la; louisiana; neworleans
WOW! How innovative of them. That should bring an abrupt halt to any and all "gun violence" in the Big Easy. Works great in chit-cago.
1 posted on 04/22/2016 8:55:12 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

They don’t have any “gun control” measures written in as part of the city ordinances now? What have these people been DOING, that they got to play catch-up with Chicago or Baltimore?


2 posted on 04/22/2016 8:57:47 AM PDT by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Brilliant idea, Mitch, I’m sure all the murderous bruvas there will obey the sh*t out of your measures like they obey every other law.


3 posted on 04/22/2016 9:01:58 AM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The measures would also outlaw guns without serial numbers and require gun-theft victims to notify police within 48 hours, according to a draft ordinance.

If the law proposes to make removing serial numbers from marked firearms illegal, I do not have an issue with that. If it outlaws firearms that have never been marked, I do have a problem.

If the law proposes that the 48 hour window starts when the gun theft is noticed, I again do not have an issue. If it is the usual "time from the theft", the mayor should be placed in public stocks at a busy intersection (with bushels of rotten veggies available for free), or the middle of the delta itself - I'm fine with either.

4 posted on 04/22/2016 9:03:40 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Gun Control

1. Buy a gun

2. Buy lots of ammo

3. Learn how to shoot safely

4. Keep it with you at all times

5. Don't be skeerd to shoot sum sun beech that is trying to keel you or your kin.

5 posted on 04/22/2016 9:03:49 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

2013 Louisiana Laws
Revised Statutes
TITLE 14 - Criminal Law
RS 14:95.7 - Possession of or dealing in firearms with obliterated numbers or marks

Universal Citation: LA Rev Stat § 14:95.7

§95.7. Possession of or dealing in firearms with obliterated numbers or marks

A. No person shall intentionally receive, possess, carry, conceal, buy, sell, or transport any firearm from which the serial number or mark of identification has been obliterated.

B. This Section shall not apply to any firearm which is an antique or war relic and is inoperable or for which ammunition is no longer manufactured in the United States and is not readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade, or which was originally manufactured without such a number.

C. Whoever violates the provisions of this Section shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars and imprisoned as follows:

(1) For a first offense, the penalty shall be imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not less than one year nor more than five years.

(2) For a second or subsequent offense, the penalty shall be imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not less than two years nor more than ten years.

Acts 1993, No. 85, §1; Acts 2012, No. 478, §1.


6 posted on 04/22/2016 9:10:24 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I thought that the NOPD stole (uh, I mean confiscated) all of the guns from citizen in NO after katrina hit.


7 posted on 04/22/2016 9:15:03 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Thanks for the information.

The mayor’s proposal is at best redundant, and at worst an unhinged attack on unmarked weapons (which I believe are all antiques and/or relics - if I understand regulations about manufacturing weapons correctly).


8 posted on 04/22/2016 9:19:49 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

New York, Chicago, New Orleans................


9 posted on 04/22/2016 9:21:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

He’s probably unaware of the laws.


10 posted on 04/22/2016 9:26:23 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Serial numbers were not required until the '68 Gun Control Act, IIRC. There might be an earlier requirement for NFA/Class 3 firearms, which were regulated in the 1930s.

There are *many* pre-'68 firearms which would become technically illegal under this ordinance. If they mean *obliterated* serial numbers, they should damned well phrase it that way.

11 posted on 04/22/2016 9:33:54 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


12 posted on 04/22/2016 10:39:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

why are these idiot cities adopting local laws which should be the state’s perview.

their city attorney must take the view” all is legal until the court of appeals says otherwise.”


13 posted on 04/22/2016 11:37:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Absotively agreed!


14 posted on 04/22/2016 12:18:05 PM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

IIRC, New Orleans previously tried restricting issuance of concealed handgun permits - and was slapped down by the state supreme court.


15 posted on 04/22/2016 2:39:22 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel; All

Louisiana passed a very strong right to keep and bear arms amendment to its Constitution in 2014.

These laws are likely to be in contradiction to the amendment. But, the Louisiana Supreme Court does not appear willing to uphold the State Constitution, as amended.

Louisiana also has a strong preemption ordinance passed in 1985.

http://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=97860


16 posted on 04/23/2016 8:28:23 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The Amendment was passed in 2012, not 2014.


17 posted on 04/23/2016 8:29:28 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson