[AndyTheBear]

I am in the same boat. I don't know what I am looking at.

I am all for seeking justice if something illicit was done, but I am just not sure yet if this evidence really confirms that. Its possible it does, but I am not following it, so I am not ready to grab my pitch fork quite yet.

[Strac6]

Thank you for some sanity.

Please see #16

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

I am in the same boat. I don't know what I am looking at. I am all for seeking justice if something illicit was done, but I am just not sure yet if this evidence really confirms that. Its possible it does, but I am not following it, so I am not ready to grab my pitch fork quite yet.

I spoke with an individual who explained it thusly:

People can be both State and Congressional District delegates, although they are different things. The people on the first document were all the "winners" of those particular spots. However, paperwork was turned in (see the second document) by the local caucus chair (a Cruz supporter) to the GOP removing the winners of the congressional district positions, and replacing them all.

It seems like this might be real evidence of theft. The person I spoke to is involved with caucusing in that state and also claims there are "hundreds of irregularities," and, "without exception, they result in Cruz getting the delegate."