You took issue with wardaddy's statement which is basically correct when you look at the statistics from the government that I posted. You made three separate statements:
"...I am assuming you’re excluding the past with the Lynchings, Cross burning etc..."
Why do you assume that, and why do you even bring it up, except to perhaps imply racist motives to his post? When was the last lynching in this country? People like you seem bound and determined to keep it forefront in the national consciousness, which puts you in the same league as a lot of people who stand to gain from racial hatred and tension, people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder, and nearly the entire Democratic Party including Barack Obama. And, probably you as well.
"...Most violent crime is between the races..i.e. white on white , black on black etc..."
What does that have to do with the subject at hand? You don't see anything unusual with normalized statistics that show that black-on-white violence is wildly out of proportion to white-on-black violence
by a factor of 200-1?
"...in 2013 they had 3005 murders of white people, 2509 were committed by whites..409 by blacks..."
What on earth does that statistic mean? It has no context, no relevance to the discussion. It is totally irrelevant because it has no context. Below are the 2013 statistics from the Justice Department. THIS has meaning. This is what you should have posted, but it wouldn't fit whatever agenda you have:
What I said was and its true is that whites rarely victimize blacks criminally which if you researched it you would know
You have thrown unsubstantiated claims which have zero to do with my statement to try to defend your premises I guess
Do I’ll address some of those nutty irrelevant claims
Whites actually child rape at around 70% of the pro rata share whereas Amerinidians child rape at a pro rata share off the charts...and it’s no secret
Blacks and Hispanics child rape at a higher pro rata rate than whites roughly triple and twice reflectively
A canard proffered by you as it were
Serial killers by race:
Blacks as a percentage of serial killers are twice their population rate
Both Hispanics and Asians mass murder at rates exceeding pro rata share
Whites at less than pro rata share
You need to learn to stick with what you are arguing and if you do offer state whether pertinent or not be accurate and ready to link them
Everything I just quoted was in easy English and found simply by googling
Serial killer or mass murderer or child rapist by race
One last sweet spot
Women mass murder at a rate twice that at which they simple murder
Btw...you wish to compare total 1866-1965 number of blacks lynched by whites with number of whites killed raped or beaten by blacks in just one year
Well I’m your huckleberry for that too...you have to be more informed to fight in this sandbox
You could start with excerpts from a publication called The Color of Crime in America
http://www.colorofcrime.com/
This is what we do here....it’s not personal you’re in over your head....but it’s important you grow as you become better informed
It’s why we’re here.