Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Clinton Email Scandal? It Might Be What She Did Legally
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 4/11/2016 | John Merline

Posted on 04/11/2016 3:47:45 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer

"I have a saying: The scandal isn’t what’s illegal, the scandal is what’s legal,” liberal editor and commentator Michael Kinsley once said. He was referring to the legal forms of corruption that go on day after day in Washington.

By that standard, the real scandal involving Hillary Clinton’s e-mails might not be that she compromised national security out of convenience by using a private e-mail server while secretary of state.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintoncrimefamily; corning; emailscandal; hillaryclinton; hillarycriminalprobe

1 posted on 04/11/2016 3:47:46 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IBD editorial writer

The issue is negligence, not intent, otherwise Petraeus should be exonerated and his fine returned. With negligence being the threshold, the mere setting up of the private server while refusing to use the dot.gov system, is a crime.

The moment the CIA was apprised of the private server being used by the Secretary of State, a massive removal of possibly compromised foreign assets will have been put into motion. A compromise HAD TO BE ASSUMED. This is the damage done to the people’s interests, even if the server was not breeched. Content of the communications is not at issue. There is evidence it was hacked, but it is still not necessary to prove intent, or at least it wouldn’t be if it were you or I in the government’s crosshairs.


2 posted on 04/11/2016 4:04:11 AM PDT by wayoverontheright (A falling camel attracts many knives.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IBD editorial writer

What some see as business as usual is still crooked at its heart. This looks like an upcoming national discussion once the details are released from the FBI investigation.


3 posted on 04/11/2016 5:10:09 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IBD editorial writer

Only a progressive, marxist, or a democrat could dream up the phrase “legal form of corruption”


4 posted on 04/11/2016 5:12:52 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

Tax credits for ethanol, wind power, solar = legal forms of corruption.


5 posted on 04/11/2016 5:15:09 AM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IBD editorial writer

Intent is irrelevant. Whether a foreign power actually has the documents is always irrelevant. As a person with access to secret documents, it is part of the obligation, to keep them secure. Failure to keep them secure, is a violation - doesn’t matter if you did not intend to expose them, doesn’t matter that you got lucky and they weren’t taken.


6 posted on 04/11/2016 5:58:20 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IBD editorial writer
She has admitted that she destroyed 30,000 documents. Why isn't anyone talking about that? That was illegal--anyone else would be in trouble for destroying one.

The reason those documents were destroyed was to cover up her solicitations of bribes and other illegalities.

7 posted on 04/11/2016 8:21:09 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson