Good to see the Brits joining their American cohorts in the femminization of the infantry. When called upon, most will be suddenly ill, pregnant or “indisposed.” Thus with no troops to send, the generals will either be forced to fight themselves or more likely quickly surrender and avoid the predicted bloodbath.
“Thus with no troops to send, the generals will either be forced to fight themselves or more likely quickly surrender and avoid the predicted bloodbath.”
That has been the idea from the beginning - to make the US military so combat-ineffective that it cannot win a long campaign. The choice will be to either go nuclear or quit.
Kemp: "Other than equal opportunities the Government has failed to put forward any arguments for lifting the ban on women in the infantry. That is because there are none. This foolish move will reduce the capability of the infantry, undermine our national defences and put lives in danger."
THAT IS THE REASON
from Daily Mail on Kemp's article:
"A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: “The MOD is undertaking a review to establish the physical standards required for ground close combat, which is due to complete in 2019.
"'It will be based upon the principle that any standards will be related to the required role rather than individual characteristics.
'No decisions have been taken and any claims of what this will involve are pure speculation.”
Colonel Kemp has previously argued that women lack the 'killer instinct' necessary to fight in close combat."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3526137/Putting-female-soldiers-line-social-engineering-experiment-paid-blood-claims-colonel-led-British-troops-war-Afghanistan.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490