[Luircin]

Logical fallacy: Ad hominem.

Twice in a row, you attack Palin instead of attacking her arguments.

Care to go for the trifecta?

[FreeReign]

I addressed the issues more than anybody on this thread, including you. And the link about Palin goes to one of the points. Palin is being hypocritical. Assuming Cruz at one time did believe in a legalization amnesty (which I don't assume BTW), then why is it okay for Sarah to change her position but not Ted.

Twice in a row, you attack Palin

I explained why her own flip flop was relevant.

...instead of attacking her arguments.

I criticized her arguments.

Look, you are either being dishonest or you're not very bright.

I'm not going to argue further with you.