[FreeReign]

I addressed the issues more than anybody on this thread, including you. And the link about Palin goes to one of the points. Palin is being hypocritical. Assuming Cruz at one time did believe in a legalization amnesty (which I don't assume BTW), then why is it okay for Sarah to change her position but not Ted.

Twice in a row, you attack Palin

I explained why her own flip flop was relevant.

...instead of attacking her arguments.

I criticized her arguments.

Look, you are either being dishonest or you're not very bright.

I'm not going to argue further with you.

[Luircin]

I don’t give damn about what you said on the thread above; I’m criticizing YOUR posts. Specifically, the ones that I’ve replied to.

And you know? Your ‘whether the flip-flop is relevant’ is little more than you saying that it is because you said so. I believe that the term is ‘begging the question.’

Also, personal insults.

Therefore, you have surpassed the trifecta.

Logical fallacy: Ad hominem, but this time directly at me.

Good day! Thanks for letting me have the last word.