This story was out 4 hours before I posted.
If FReepers weren’t so busy peeing on each others shoes, we could focus on the enemy.
As soon as the FBI would make just one of the aides an offer for cooperation the attorney would have to withdraw and quit representing them all or it would be a blatant conflict of interest.
This is a tight spot for Hillary and her minions. They don’t know what the FBI knows. Were they able to recover those 30,000 emails Hillary decided were “personal” (criminal?) and deleted? Anything but the absolute truth is an automatic obstruction of justice charge.
I bet they all lawyer up and don’t say a word.
Don’t you think you add a little more of the content of the article?
Some legal experts might call that a conspiracy to obstruct justice, like maybe if Hillary was a Republican.
Let them read from the same script. It won’t matter because Clinton has made so many public statements that have been shown to be false, she will have to explain the discrepancies, which will likely lead to a perjury trap. Unless the fix is in (highly likely) she will be hoist by her own petard.
Can someone say ‘Jonestown’? Cult Billary is just about to come crashing down.
Ah, conspiracy.
"The strategy can also bolster the defense team as a whole, allowing the lawyer to gather information from multiple clients to help benefit another, legal experts said. Wilkinson, for instance, will get an idea of the FBI’s line of questioning after her first client's interview, which could benefit following witnesses.
gotta get their story straight.
less chance of obstruction or lying to a federal agent.
Pagliano has agreed to work with the FBI in exchange for immunity. He is Hillary’s dissenter, and could sink the aides and Hillary.
This is nothing but the start of a Kabuki dance....
(LOL! In honor of April Fool's Day!)
Makeup-Free Chelsea Clinton Looks Like ‘Real’ Dad
SHARE The National ENQUIRER caught Chelsea Clinton landing in Los Angeles to campaign for her mom Hillary — and her bulging baby bump couldn't distract from her disturbing resemblance to rumored "real" dad Webster Hubbell!
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/photos/chelsea-clinton-paternity-scandal-bill-hillary-webster-hubbell/photo/153734/
Sure they will have a common strategy during their interviews (which apparently will not be taken under oath according to press reports):
To every question they will answer: “I have no specific recollection or memory of that [document, email, conversation, etc]”
It avoids usiing the 5th Amendment which is bad optics—and has been proven to completely stall any prosecution based on testimony. Reference: Eric Holder and Hillary Clinton. I believe she used that formulation or some variant over 250 times in the investigation of her various activities conducted in the 90s by Special Prosecutors.
Basically, it works.