Replies

To: dayglored; ShadowAce; ThunderSleeps; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; ...

Liz Peek of The Financial Times at Yahoo! Finance is clearly clueless about what Apple's position was all about in the FBI v. Apple fight. She seems to think it was about marketing the iPhone's security, not providing privacy to all Apple users. . . and that the FBI's ability to hack into one iPhone 5C with an expensive hack using a third party is not proof of a general vulnerability to Apple's more modern iOS devices at all. Her mis-understanding leads her to conclude that Apple lost this battle. — PING!

Pinging dayglored, Shadow Ace, and ThunderSleeps for followup Monday Morning Quarterbacking of the FBI v. Apple fight.

Apple v. FBI
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

3 posted on 03/30/2016 4:26:18 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)

What a silly twit this author is. She clearly has no understanding whatsoever of the technical facts, yet she proclaims conclusions based on her flawed misapprehensions.

Such articles are no different from junk tweets... not worth bothering with 'em. They're a dime a dozen and even at that, a ripoff of people's time.

39 posted on 03/30/2016 5:57:58 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794