Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Reading the comments today here on FR and many people, presumably all Trump devotees, claim the National Enquirer is like the gold standard and that they’d never run with something that isn’t true!

Never mind that 99% of what the NE prints is pure tabloid trash, or that even this smear on Cruz is carefully couched so that it only claims that investigators are looking into these allegations - not any actual new facts or evidence.

Oh yeah, the National Enquirer endorses Donald Trump for President. Not so sure that is an endorsement any respectable candidate would want.


20 posted on 03/25/2016 1:53:44 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Longbow1969

NE endorsed Trump?

Link please.

The Clintons are quite famously and comfortably connected to NE, so would like to know why they didn’t endorse her? Come to think of it I have never seen NE endorse a candidate


25 posted on 03/25/2016 1:56:50 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

The CIA under Brennan wouldn’t use such a crude means to off Saclia. They have much more sophisticated means now, like a way to cause a heart attack with electromagnetic waves from outside the wall of the bedroom, etc.


46 posted on 03/25/2016 2:21:44 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson