Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandy Hook Promise Mom Flags Warning Signs for “Gun Violence”
thetruthaboutguns.com ^ | 3/24/2016 | Robert Farago

Posted on 03/25/2016 7:01:47 AM PDT by rktman

Sandy Hook Promise Mom Flags Warning Signs for “Gun Violence” By Robert Farago on March 24, 2016

Nicole Hockley is the founder and managing director of Sandy Hook Promise, a “nonprofit working to end gun-related deaths.” In the intro to Ms. Hockley’s TEDx talk she declares “On December 14, 2012, a mentally unwell young man with unrestricted access to high-powered firearms went to an elementary school in Sandy Hook, Connecticut and killed 20 first graders and six educators.” Unrestricted access? Adam Lanza shot his mother in the head and stole her guns. High-powered? As opposed to? You see, the thing is . . .

details matter.

(Excerpt) Read more at thetruthaboutguns.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol; mommunists
If only there were interalactic background checks required......... Sorry ms. hockley, bad guys and nutbags do NOT care what restrictions and requirements and laws and "Gun Free Zone" signs you put up. Making regular Joe citizens defenseless only makes them additional victims.
1 posted on 03/25/2016 7:01:47 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Because he was “handicapped”, it would have been illegal to suspect him. That would be Hate.
You may as well suspect Muslims for terrorist attacks.


2 posted on 03/25/2016 7:04:17 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Get ou’cher Captain Obvious suit, Pap.


3 posted on 03/25/2016 7:05:50 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

End the GUN FREE ZONES.


4 posted on 03/25/2016 7:07:01 AM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Now that’s just downright racis’. Or something.


5 posted on 03/25/2016 7:07:20 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

They’ve already painted every senior who receives Social Security as being “mentally unwell” and they should not be allowed to own a firearm. It’s the old “camel’s nose” thing. It works every time the communists use it.


6 posted on 03/25/2016 7:08:32 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America is not a dump, sewer or "refugee" camp. It's my home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“...with unrestricted access to high-powered firearms...”

A lie. There were restrictions on him. Under CT law, he was legally forbidden from possessing guns due to his age. Further, the guy was loony. He really ought to have been locked away, or at least there should have been a requirement that no firearms be kept in the house where he lived. It’s not gun laws that failed here, it’s the medical community. No background check would have stopped this, because he never attempted to buy any of the guns he used.


7 posted on 03/25/2016 7:11:47 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I put the blame squarely on his mother. This utterly stupid person should have had nothing of the kind near her mentally deranged son. She paid for her stupidity with her life but unfortunately so did many others.


8 posted on 03/25/2016 7:14:23 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

If this was a muzzi we wouldn’t have heard about it.


9 posted on 03/25/2016 7:56:36 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“unrestricted access”

If you count having to kill someone to get something “unrestricted access” I have “unrestricted access” to a lot of things.


10 posted on 03/25/2016 8:04:10 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Gun Free Zone - -

Isn’t that where you can just pick up a whole pile of guns, after the battle?


11 posted on 03/25/2016 8:13:17 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

His mom certainly had a hand in the failure here as well.

Raging mental illness is pretty hard to miss, even when the family might slip into denial.

For the record, I have had to (with my sister) involuntarily commit another family member to an institution. More than once.


12 posted on 03/25/2016 8:25:56 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman
RE: "unrestricted access" and "high-powered firearms".

Why do anti gun rights bigots always lie about things like this? Access was not "unrestricted" and the guns were not "high-powered", nor were any "high" capacity magazines used. These morons can't even get the terminology correct.

13 posted on 03/25/2016 9:25:56 AM PDT by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson