I can’t see much, if any, of this ‘evidence’ getting through the courts’ ‘expectation of privacy’ doctrine.
As they have in the past they Willie about where they got their lead or tip
“I can’t see much, if any, of this ‘evidence’ getting through the courts’ ‘expectation of privacy’ doctrine.”
I can. They contact the FBI or cops, and the cops find another way to “discover” the evidence. Think in terms of driving some dope and they know you are from snooping. They call the Highway Patrol who stops you for going 73 in a 70 zone. Then his dog farts and that means it senses drugs. He searches your car and “finds” the dope.
You’ll have no clue the NSA intercepted your text message or read your email. Stasi...
You obviously are not aware of FISA judges? There is no expectation of any digital privacy whatsoever. That’s why any decent lawyer doesn’t use a computer for communication or recording of conversations with clients. A yellow notepad with cryptic references is all they use. All computer or messaging data is sent by low level staffers for filing briefs, court filings, and so on.