Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

“I can’t see much, if any, of this ‘evidence’ getting through the courts’ ‘expectation of privacy’ doctrine.”

I can. They contact the FBI or cops, and the cops find another way to “discover” the evidence. Think in terms of driving some dope and they know you are from snooping. They call the Highway Patrol who stops you for going 73 in a 70 zone. Then his dog farts and that means it senses drugs. He searches your car and “finds” the dope.

You’ll have no clue the NSA intercepted your text message or read your email. Stasi...


9 posted on 03/24/2016 8:06:44 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

I expect these rules to just allow some- legally actionable- info collected overseas to be accessed by domestic police.
Which wouldn’t fit your scenario.
We’ll see.
And, of course, the ‘slippery slope’ factor will have to be considered.


10 posted on 03/24/2016 8:20:02 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson