Posted on 03/23/2016 5:33:01 PM PDT by Mount Athos
The New York Police Department has been directed by a U.S. court to remove from its online records an investigation pertaining to the rise of Islamic extremists in the West and the threats these individuals pose to American safety, according to legal documents.
As part of a settlement agreement reached earlier this month with Muslim community advocates in U.S. District Court, the NYPD will purge from its website an extensive report that experts say has been critical to the department’s understanding of radical Islam and its efforts to police the threat.
The court settlement also stipulates that the NYPD make a concerted effort to mitigate the impact of future terror investigations on certain religious and political groups, according to a copy of the court documents published by the American Civil Liberties Union, which has spearheaded the case since June 2013.
Legal experts and critics of the settlement maintain that it could hamper future terrorism investigations and view it as part of a larger campaign by Muslim advocacy organizations in the United States to dismantle surveillance programs encompassing that community.
Critics expressed particular concern about the case in light of a recent surge in attacks on U.S. citizens committed by individuals pledging allegiance to terror groups such as ISIS.
A key portion of the settlement focuses on the NYPD’s purported use of a document produced by the department’s intelligence division to examine how radicalized individuals make their way to the United States and carry out terror attacks.
The document, “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat,” aimed to provide local law enforcement and policy makers with information about domestic terrorists and their operations.
As part of the settlement agreement, the NYPD will be forced to remove the publication from its database and vow not to rely on it in the future.
The NYPD and New York state government agencies included in the case “represent that they do not, have not, and will not rely upon the Radicalization in the West report to open or extend investigations,” according to the settlement. “Defendants will remove the Radicalization in the West report from the NYPD website.”
The settlement further affirms that the NYPD will be “committed to mitigating the potential impact” of future investigations on political and religious groups, such as those in the Muslim-American community.
While NYPD officials would not comment Thursday when contacted by the Washington Free Beacon, a spokesperson directed a reporter to a recent press release affirming the department’s commitment to upholding the court settlement.
The NYPD and relevant New York state agencies will “provide additional guidance to police officers as part of a settlement of lawsuits accusing the NYPD of improperly investigating Muslim groups,” according to the Jan. 7 press release. “While the City did not admit to engaging in any improper practices, the changes represent an effort to provide more detailed guidance to NYPD personnel within the existing Handschu Guidelines,” which govern how authorities investigate political activities.
The NYPD confirmed that it would remove from its website the 2007 radicalization report.
The department will additionally incorporate into the guidelines “police policies against religious profiling” and insert an additional “provision for considering the impact investigations have on people who are not targets of investigations,” according to the statement.
John Miller, the NYPD’s deputy commissioner of intelligence and counterterrorism, maintained in a statement that the settlement would not “weaken the [department’s] ability to fulfill its steadfast commitment to investigate and prevent terrorist activity in New York City.”
However, some experts have cast doubt on this statement, claiming that the decision to delete the anti-terrorism handbook will impact officers’ ability to understand how terrorists organize and operate in the United States.
Benjamin Weingarten, a writer and national security analyst who has covered the court case, said that local police departments should be relying more heavily on the now-banned counterterror analysis.
Referring to the recent shooting of a Philadelphia police officer by a radicalized individual who allegedly pledged allegiance to ISIS, Weingarten noted that the assailant followed the “‘four stages of radicalization’ detailed in the NYPD report.”
The information about radical terrorists provided in “the NYPD’s analysis may have at the least led Philadelphia authorities to dig deeper and flag him,” he said.
The settlement further reflects a larger cultural shift in America that shuns terms such as “war on terror” and “Muslim terrorism,” Weingarten said.
“To pursue a see-no-Islam counter-jihadist strategy is not only absurd and contradictory on its face, but its a severe dereliction of duty—ignorance is not an excuse, and it represents a failure to do everything necessary to defend against an ideology that seeks to undermine the Constitution and subvert and destroy Western civilization again, according to Islamic supremacists themselves,” he said.
Stephen Coughlin, an attorney and intelligence officer, expressed concern about what he described as a widening attempt by local and federal authorities to redefine the nature of domestic counter-terror efforts.
“I am greatly concerned with the imposition of [the case] which, I believe, exists to replace counter-terror efforts,” Coughlin said. “This is a continuation of a purging of evidentiary based counter-terror analysis first initiated in 2011.”
The ACLU and Muslim community advocates initially filed the lawsuit following reports after the 9/11 terror attacks that the NYPD was running a domestic spy operation centered on the American-Muslim community.
The ACLU, which would not comment on record for this report, directed the Free Beacon to a recent editorial published in the Guardian celebrating the court decision.
“Bias-based policing legitimizes religious discrimination, It can pave the way to copy-cat approaches by other agencies and set the stage for hate crimes nationwide,” wrote Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s national security project, and Ramzi Kassem, a law professor at the City University of New York.
“We hope the settlement announced this week pulls our city and its police department out of a downward spiral by reaffirming core values and principles, ones just as necessary to a local police force as they are to a rational debate on civil rights and liberties nationally,” they wrote.
Those who left the USA and Europe to join rebels in Syria are returning right now.
They performed atrocities and genocide on Christians and other religious minorities in Syria.
It really shouldn't surprise anyone when they do terrorist attacks in the USA and Europe after coming back home.
This article is an example of how we are crippling our ability to prevent and stop these mass murder attacks.
The USA’s relentless march to suicide continues.
We’re one generation away from obliteration.
Basta*rd Obama!
***
Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Anti-Muslim Speech, Calls San Bernardino ‘Wonderful Opportunity’
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/04/loretta-lynch-vows-prosecute-anti-muslim-speech-calls-san-bernardino-wonderful-opportunity/
This is the mindset of obama.
The Executive should just tell the judicial to go into the wind.
Sharia Law for NYPD.
Trial then gibbet..
Just wait until Hillary is president! It’s going to get worse.
Before they delete the report, it MUST be leaked on-line.
Wow. I wish Tom Selleck was the Commissioner in NYC. He would stand up for the people of NY!
And the Mus-slimes laugh on their way to their next bombing or shooting.
Just transfer data to an Apple phone.
I grew up in New York city and people don’t believe me when I call it the most leftist city in the country. How many more examples do people require?
Today they had an article in the NY post about a Muslim taxi driver who said he is joining ISIS and he is going to blow up his taxi like a car bomb. Not only wasn’t he arrested, they gave him BACK his hack license and he is back to driving a taxi. HELLO! Look.......
http://nypost.com/2016/03/22/isis-loving-cabbie-shouldnt-lose-license-for-bomb-threat-judge-says/
Then last year after a cop was shot and killed, instead on honoring him, the city council chose instead to honor commie spy Ethel Rosenberg for her “bravery”... I kid you not..........
http://nypost.com/2015/09/29/city-council-honors-woman-executed-for-treason-in-1953/
There is a REASON Obama went to more fundraisers in NYC than any other city, because it IS the most leftist city in the country. I mean my God, they elected a hardcore blatant commie as Mayor! That city is just one huge cesspool of leftist vomitus.
Unless they go after Hollyweird first...
I can’t post anything that I’m thinking without getting kicked off FR.
Can’t say “Islamic Terrorist”?
Well, in Ukraine during the famine under Stalin:
“The agents went through the houses and said, ‘There was no famine. Forget it. Don’t say a word,’ “ Haraschenko said. “If you talked about it, if you even said the word ‘famine,’ you went to Siberia.”
Add in a little of Orwell’s 1984 ...
anything on a public website can be very easily downloaded and then sent via email to all of a person’s friends
in less than about three minutes.....
Unbelievable. One more reason Islam needs to be removed from the list of protected religions since it is NOT a religion at all at its core. Once that’s done we can deal with this element of hate and terrorism the way it should be. Incrementally removing it from Western society completely. It is not compatible with Western life at all and never will be.
WHo was the judge? Why did NYPD capitulate? Let me guess, Mayor diBlasio. Treacherous SOB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.