How about First offense: permanent removal from program?
1 posted on
03/18/2016 3:30:55 PM PDT by
kevcol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: kevcol
Amazing how our entitled gibsmedats feign offense that the taxpayers that foot their every bill want some kind of accountability. People should be absolutely enraged not just that this abuse was happening, but that every single state doesn’t require drug testing for recipients. Crazy...
2 posted on
03/18/2016 3:32:34 PM PDT by
kearnyirish2
(Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
To: kevcol
The thrust of the bill was by the pole dancer and payed for by food stamps.
3 posted on
03/18/2016 3:33:05 PM PDT by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: kevcol
“Permanent removal from program?”
Sounds right to me.
Just abide by the rules and there won’t be any problems.
4 posted on
03/18/2016 3:34:33 PM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
To: kevcol
They will find a way around it...
5 posted on
03/18/2016 3:34:33 PM PDT by
Popman
(Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
To: kevcol
Eliminate the program
Problem solved
6 posted on
03/18/2016 3:35:03 PM PDT by
arl295
To: kevcol
Gimmedats will just trade their EBT credit for whatever they want. Drugs, smokes, booze, hookers, you name it.
And YOU’RE paying for it.
7 posted on
03/18/2016 3:36:02 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: kevcol
Really? Taxpayer’s money going for all that? What took them so long and why is this person fighting it think it’s too harsh?
8 posted on
03/18/2016 3:36:58 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: kevcol
Are people supposed to bring their own bag lunches to those places now?
To: kevcol
bs and they will never be able to track it anyway...so it won’t work which is what they really want!
10 posted on
03/18/2016 3:37:14 PM PDT by
ldish
(Have had enough...you??????)
To: kevcol
You’re confusing food assistance with cash welfare.
Cash welfare is supposed to go towards living expenses. Food assistance is for food only.
Some people’s EBT cards are loaded with both benefits. Its easy to abuse cash welfare.
11 posted on
03/18/2016 3:37:28 PM PDT by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: kevcol
12 posted on
03/18/2016 3:37:47 PM PDT by
kevcol
To: kevcol
Gee, is it that the taxpayers are tired of paying for this crud?? First clue being ....
13 posted on
03/18/2016 3:38:23 PM PDT by
bboop
(does not suffer fools gladly)
To: kevcol
Government employees who adminster the social safety net don’t value the tax money under their control as would a Christian relief organization. The relief organization views their funds as precious, scarce resource while the Lois Lerner types could give a rat’s a$$ about misuse of the public till.
This whole issue could be solved by getting government the he## out of social issues.
15 posted on
03/18/2016 3:40:37 PM PDT by
bkopto
To: kevcol
What? Olives, lemons, cherries, pretzels and beer-nuts ain’t food???
16 posted on
03/18/2016 3:42:43 PM PDT by
Happy Rain
(DON'T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR CRUZ)
To: kevcol
Had me going for a second, thought it was the US House instead of an individual state one. Dang...
17 posted on
03/18/2016 3:45:21 PM PDT by
W.
(Screw it. Send in the Marines!)
To: kevcol
19 posted on
03/18/2016 3:46:36 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
To: kevcol
My, just think if you were to use Doctor Who’s Tardis to go back to 1931 New York City or Chicago and tell the people waiting in the lines at the soup kitchens that people about eighty years later would be using welfare benefits (intended to help the needy) for strip clubs and liquor stores. The reactions would be interesting to say the least.
20 posted on
03/18/2016 3:47:25 PM PDT by
OttawaFreeper
("You'd see a different game if nobody wore a helmet". NY Rangers' Barry Beck 1983)
To: kevcol
People will be dying in the streets!
To: kevcol
First offense: a one-month reduction in benefits
And the first time that is applied, the EBT holder can go to the press and claim their kids are going to starve because social services cut their benefits.
The will come the public backlash.
22 posted on
03/18/2016 3:47:42 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: kevcol
23 posted on
03/18/2016 3:47:50 PM PDT by
BBell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson