Posted on 03/16/2016 4:05:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
George Washington, our first president, is probably our greatest and most decent statesman. We celebrate Washington's Birthday each February. But March 16th marks the birthday of probably the second-most important and decent American, James Madison.
Madison became our fourth president, but his presidency is not the chief source of his greatness. There would have been an entirely different America without Madison's enormous input and foresight at the contentious 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. There were 55 delegates to the convention. Like Madison, some had a formal college education, while others did not. From Madison's notes about the quality of the debates and discourse, one could not tell who was college-educated and who was not. Their ages ranged from 26 (Jonathan Dayton) to 81 (Benjamin Franklin), with the average age being 42.
Alexander Hamilton was a key figure at the convention. He called for a president for life with total veto power over the legislature. Most other delegates, led by Madison along with John Adams, wanted a republic; none wanted a democracy. Madison, who would become known as the "Father of the Constitution," argued that in a pure democracy, "there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual." Delegate Edmund Randolph agreed, saying, "In tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy." Adams added: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Eleven years earlier, Madison had helped to develop the Virginia Constitution, and it was his Virginia Plan that served as the basis for debate in the development of the U.S. Constitution. Madison, along with Hamilton, argued for a strong but limited central government that could unify the country.
During the Constitutional Convention, a proposal was made that would have allowed the federal government to suppress a seceding state. Madison rejected it by saying, as summarized by the transcript: "A union of the states containing such an ingredient (would seem) to provide for its own destruction. The use of force against a state would look more like a declaration of war than an infliction of punishment and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolution of all previous compacts by which it might be bound." This vision of a state's independence and right to secede was expressed at Virginia's ratification convention, which held, "The powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression." Rhode Island's and New York's ratification documents made similar statements. By the way, Rhode Island anti-federalist resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out July 4, 1788.
Madison's political genius is mostly seen in his contribution to The Federalist Papers, which were co-authored with Hamilton and John Jay. The papers were written to persuade the citizens of New York -- and secondarily other states -- to ratify the Constitution. Ratification was no easy task. The 1783 Treaty of Paris, which ended our war with Great Britain, held that each state was a sovereign nation. As such, each feared giving up its rights to a powerful central government. Anti-federalists wanted some sort of guarantee that states would remain sovereign and that the power of the federal government would be limited and it would be recognized as a creation of, an agent of and a servant of the states. They said their votes to ratify could only be obtained if the Constitution contained a bill of rights guaranteeing the rights of the people and their states. The most notable and influential anti-federalists were Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, George Mason and Richard Henry Lee.
These few words here do little justice to James Madison's greatness as one of our Founding Fathers, but a day honoring his birth would help us learn more about his contribution and, as well, learn how much we have betrayed his vision of what constitutes a free people.
Thanks for a great tribute by Walter E. Williams to the “Father of the Constitution”, James Madison.
The federal government has reneged on the deal.
Time for the several states to start asserting their independence.
A tribute by Walter Williams to the Father of our Constitution and 4th President — James Madison.
FRee Mail me if you want on, or off, this Founding Father/George Washington/Revolutionary War ping list
After reading extensively about the events surrounding the Whiskey Rebellion in the early 1790s, I realized that the United States of America as envisioned by these Founders probably didn't even last one decade.
Then you misunderstand the Founders' original intent for their Constitution.
In fact, the Constitution in several places addresses issues like rebellion, insurrection, "domestic violence", invasion and treason.
These provision came into play during the Whiskey Rebellion, and again in 1861.
The Federalist Papers set standards of highly educated, erudite thinking underlying the short & simple words of the Constitution.
Properly understood, the Federalist Papers should bind & limit progressive-liberal Democrats in their never-ending quest for total Big Government power.
Your is a “hammer meets nail” comment.
That's exactly right, and the way it's supposed to be.
Hasn’t worked out that way, though; has it?
Agreed, especially since the "Progressive era" beginning around 1890.
No it hasn't, but since the Constitution is amendable, the fault resides with the sovereign . . . us.
Many of the "insurrectionists" were former soldiers in the American Revolution who took up arms because they decided that the Federal government in Washington, D.C. was no better than King George III.
Most of these "insurrectionists" were either acquitted of any crimes, or were eventually pardoned.
The whiskey tax was eliminated after Thomas Jefferson took office in 1801.
I don't know ... it sounds to me as if the "rebels" were right all along.
And because of the WR we have Kentucky Bourbon.
Thank God.
L
The US Constitution specifically authorizes the Federal Government to repel invasions and suppress insurrections, rebellions, "domestic violence" or treason.
So President Washington's actions especially in 1794 regarding the Whiskey Rebellion clearly express Founders' Original Intent.
That military operation resulted in several killed and 170 captured.
In Kentucky, over a six year period, 175 distillers were convicted of violating the Whiskey tax law.
But the government's relative leniency toward rebels, eventual pardon of their leaders and revoking the Whiskey tax after 1801, that is now typical of Washington DC's response to rebellions since, including the one started in 1861.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.