Posted on 03/13/2016 1:14:59 PM PDT by Randall_S
A reader sent me a link to an op-ed in the March 9 Bradenton Herald titled, “Facts about Muslim faith ignored as fear-mongering, fabrications spread.” The op-ed was written by Hassan Shibly, director for the Council for American Islamic Relations-Florida (CAIR-FL).
Shibly states in the op-ed:
“(The) Prophet Muhammad migrated to Medina to seek freedom of religion and fought several defensive battles while building alliances with Jewish and Christian communities.”
During a 2005 interview, Shibly supported the following statements about non-Muslims and homosexuals made by Khalid Yasin, his mentor: “There’s no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend. If you prefer the clothing of the kafirs over the clothing of the Muslims, most of those names that’s on most of those clothings (sic) is faggots, homosexuals and lesbians.”
In August 2014 Shibly tweeted that “Israel and its supporters are enemies of God and humanity.”
So which is the correct interpretation of Mohammed? Which of these statements is the real Hassan Shibly?
Don Boys, Ph.D. in a 2004 column titled, “Islam Permits Lying to Deceive Unbelievers and Bring World Domination!” writes:
al-Taqiyya: deception; the Islamic word for concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies.
It is impossible to understand Islam and Muslims by listening to their protestations against terror and their proclamations of patriotism for America. Usually, it is wise and fair to give people the benefit of the doubt, but when it comes to national safety and the future of America, we had better look twice, even thrice at Muslim patriotism.
Why? Because Islam permits lying! It is called “al-Taqiyya.” One Muslim said that al-Taqiyya means dissimulation, then he expanded it to diplomacy but he should have gone further to deception.
Now some Muslims who do not follow the Koran are as faithful Americans as any of us, but the problem is we cannot know.
Dr. Boys notes, “Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman into a bedroom and (4) to facilitate one on his journey. Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection. Muslims will tell you that concealment of a truth is not an abandonment of that truth if it benefits Islam.”
Shibly states in the op-ed, “I am scared.” Is he facilitating deception in his journey to bring Islam to America? That is the question.
Shibly blames the Muslim migration to Europe on American foreign policy, stating, “In reality, the migration we see is a direct result of our failed foreign policy that destabilized the Middle East, such as the illegal invasion of Iraq, which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the birth of groups like ISIS.”
But the Islamic State (ISIS) was birthed after President Obama removed all troops from Iraq. So how can this be? Why are Muslims and Christians alike being slaughtered by Muslims in the Middle East and Africa? Answer: Because they have been for 1400 years, ever since Mohammed migrated from Mecca to Median in 622 and ended with the conquest of Mecca in 630.
It is the global strategy to establish the Caliphate.
To understand Islam, one must understand Mohammed. Shibly has stated to the author that he “traces his blood line directly to Mohammed.”
Shibly is not only a follower of Mohammed, his family lineage goes back to Mohammed.
Rich Swier, holds a doctorate of education from the University of Southern California. He is a 23-year Army veteran who retired as a lieutenant colonel in 1990.
Republished with permission of author - Dr. Rich Swier.
Eventually islam will be destroyed, or the West will be as they cannot coexist.
Whatever, it plays into some sort of self esteem disorder.
LOL! No, he was thrown out of his home-place of Mecca because he and his followers refused to tolerate the polytheists and the main religon there at the time. (Which started with a Z, but I can't recall the name).
Anyway, after they managed to take over in Medina, they went back to Mecca and put it to the sword.
The world must submit to islam was mohammads basic tenant, and what they call 'extremists' are nothing of the kind.
This is flat out taqiyya, deceiving us naive Kafirs with Islamic deception and propaganda.
Muhammed went to Medina because he lost his protection from his own tribe in Mecca when his uncle Talib died. Muhammad's tribe the Qurash, made money taking care of the Kaabah and getting gifts from the visitors, The Qurash were outraged at Muhammed because he attacked all religious beliefs and said if you didn't become a Muslim , you were gong to hell because your beliefs in Idols or Judaism or Christianity were false. After Muhammad's tribal respected uncle Talib died, the Meccans were going to kill Muhammed, who was negatively affecting people of all beliefs from visiting the Kaaba , but Muhammed escaped assassination and fled to Medina, about 210 miles north.
Part of the Koran was gathered in Mecca, and that is the peaceful verses, but when Muhammed got to Medina, Allah introduced more militant verses on how to deal with us non- Muslims. Subjugate convert or kill us.
These so-called defensive battles eventually spread to the whole known world because that is what Allah wants.
And that hasn't changed to this day.
CAIR is a Muslim propaganda group that Obama has allowed to infiltrate our Govt. at the highest levels and advise us on Muslim goings on and silence critics of Islam.
CAIR is always going to hide the true intentions of Islam, by deceiving us Kafirs. -Tom
For the Westerner, defined as a Christian or Jew but not limited to these two groups alone, when dealing with a Muslim, it is best to immediately assume Taquiya and/or Kitman is being employed...
For ages, Westerners who have lived among Muslims and within their nations have advised this approach as best defense...
Then, if the self-interest of the Westerner is involved, and further investigation and observation reveal the Muslim is speaking and acting truthfully, the Westerner can safely assume it’s because it is in the Muslim’s own best self-interest, at that moment, to do so...
Expect Muslims you must deal with to slip/slide into and out of these forms of permissible dissimulation (lying/deception) frequently and regularly, as any relations you have progress...
The US Constitution and our way of live versus Islam and Sharia Law cannot and will never co-exist...Any apparent “co-existence” will be at best a temporary condition (illusion) while Muslims are a minority and without any true power, and continue only until the Muslims gain the upper hand...
It is impossible to co-exist with people who’s very reason for being is to convert you to their ways, or kill you...Ultimately, those are and will always be your only two choices...
There is one thing we should know. No Muslim can be a true American citizen as they do not assimilate, will always believe in the Koran, do not believe our one nation under God, and more. Kick every Muslim SOB out of America.
Zoroasterism?
I'm fairly certain that was it. Thanks!
This article and the Bill Warner video provide indispensable historical context that, unfortunately, is of little interest to many (probably most) people. Islam has been at war with the West since its inception and will most likely continue to be at war with us for centuries to come.
It may be of interest to some that Bill Warner’s video presentation (which includes some excellent graphics) is based largely on a theory developed by the great Belgian historian Henri Pirenne (1862-1835). The Pirenne Thesis was never very popular with medieval historians, probably due in large part to the romanticization of Islam by Western intellectuals dating back at least as far as Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881). The continued marginalization of the Pirenne Thesis by most mainstream historians despite a wealth of historical and archaeological evidence to the contrary is based in substantial part to the multiculturalist ideology that pervades the academic Left. However, some historians have refused to acquiesce to this political correctness and have produced books that, in my view, dispose of the issue in Pirenne’s favor. These books, available on Amazon, are by John J. O’Neill (Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization) and Emmett Scott (Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy). Those areas that Islam has conquered have been largely destroyed, and any subsequent cultural efflorescence or “golden age” that occurred was due mainly to local native talent, not because of Islam but despite its pernicious influence.
the hypnosis of fear.
Unfortunately even that description is completely lost on the majority of people. The only thing that will motivate people to confront the human condition is profound suffering. In most cases there is nobody there capable of answering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.