Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/05/2016 6:48:07 AM PST by snarkpup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: snarkpup

What you mean: “Stop”? Many of them would be volunteering to participate!


2 posted on 03/05/2016 6:50:59 AM PST by jennings2004 ("What difference, at this point, does it make!"! Senator Cruz: Canadian from birth to May, 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Good article.


3 posted on 03/05/2016 6:51:49 AM PST by Tax-chick (Support Ted Cruz! He might not be as bad as the other available choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

For $2.6 million, I’d be happy to personally teach Chinese prostitutes how to drink more responsibly. Heck, I’ll even provide the drinks.


4 posted on 03/05/2016 6:53:54 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

I’ll be happy to study their failure to stop studying such things. I’ll work from home or other remote locations like beaches or ski resorts (saves them the cost of an office for me), 30 hours a week, 48 weeks a year and only want $100K a year plus the same benefit package the congress has. I’m cheap at the price!


5 posted on 03/05/2016 6:53:58 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

What do Chinese prostitutes call 69?


6 posted on 03/05/2016 6:54:52 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Stopping would reduce the size of government and therefore cut into their power. No for them always better to make fun and pretend to be concerned while they double-down on yet another wasteful expenditure of taxpayer money.


7 posted on 03/05/2016 6:54:59 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

8 posted on 03/05/2016 6:59:18 AM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

National Institutes of Health (NIH):
$1.5 million to find out why three-fourths of American lesbians are overweight when most gay males are not;
$400,000 to find out why men in Argentina engage in risky sexual behavior while drunk;
$442,000 to study the behavior of male prostitutes in Vietnam;
$593,000 study to figure out why chimpanzees throw their poop;
$176,000 to determine whether quail are more likely to procreate when high on cocaine;
666,900 for a study on the benefits of watching TV reruns;
$387,000 giving 18 New Zealand White rabbits Swedish massages after exercise, to see if they felt better.

Department of Agriculture (USDA)
$300,000 to encourage Americans to eat caviar produced in Idaho;
$50,000 to help pay for the annual Hawaiian Chocolate Festival;
30,000 to farmers developing a database of farms that host guests for overnight “haycations;”
$700,000 to study methane gas emissions from dairy cows.

promotional efforts
$505,000 “to promote specialty hair and beauty products for cats and dogs;”
$75,000 grant to promote awareness of Michigan Christmas trees and poinsettias is probably helpful to the local producers;
neon sign museum in Las Vegas ($1.8 million);
magic museum in Marshall, Michigan ($147,000);
Mother’s Day Shrine in Grafton, West Virginia ($123,050).

U.S. Air Force spent $300,000 on a study to find how is life on the Western Slope enhanced by knowing that the first bird on Earth probably had black feathers;

National Science Foundation
$171,000 monkeys like to gamble

government’s burning questions
$331,000) gave hungry spouses voodoo dolls to stab, representing their partners, and concluded that apparently people get irritable when they get hungry;
$500 million to find out why 5-year-old children can’t sit still in kindergarten;
216,000 to study whether or not politicians “gain or lose support by taking ambiguous positions;”
$400,000 on a program to train politicians in India how to communicate with their constituents.


9 posted on 03/05/2016 7:07:01 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup
Members of Congress often use these stories about absurd taxpayer-funded studies to make fun of the bureaucracy.

All the while hoping nobody notices that they, the members of Congress, voted to fund this crap.

10 posted on 03/05/2016 7:07:10 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Some studies which have been criticized do have genuine scientific or economic benefits. But someone who wants to study prostitutes, gay or otherwise, in a foreign country IMHO most likely just wants their travel and lifestyle to be subsidized by the taxpayer. Why are these grants approved? The people doing the approving must be corrupt themselves.


11 posted on 03/05/2016 7:07:56 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Why does US government have something against drunk Chinese whores?


18 posted on 03/05/2016 8:57:47 AM PST by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him whygrade switches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Me Rove you rong time.


22 posted on 03/05/2016 9:26:03 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson