**comment removed by moderator**
1 posted on
03/04/2016 2:57:27 PM PST by
Morgana
To: Morgana
How did Cruz’s pick Roberts vote?
To: Morgana
What was it, 5 to 3, or what?
3 posted on
03/04/2016 3:07:23 PM PST by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
To: Morgana
The pro-life law would protect women by ensuring that abortionists have admitting privileges at a local hospital, that informed consent protections apply to all abortions, and that facilities that perform more than five abortions maintain proper licensing. What could possibly be reasonably interpreted as unconstitutional in that?
4 posted on
03/04/2016 3:08:40 PM PST by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: Morgana
On the outside chance that Scalia was murdered, who is benefitting?
5 posted on
03/04/2016 3:10:15 PM PST by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Morgana
Why be profane? A “God please help us” would be fitting about now.
7 posted on
03/04/2016 3:16:50 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Morgana
EVERY decision gives the left wing what it wants.
To: Morgana
Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder.....
To: Morgana
I don’ get how requiring a doctor to be able to admit patients to a hospital is not a good law. Is it because abortions aren’t done by doctors? Is it because there’s a fee that abortion clinics would have to pay to get admitting rights?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson