Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. elections official warns Clinton camp no stumping in polls
BOSTON HERALD ^ | Tuesday, March 01, 2016 | Bob McGovern

Posted on 03/02/2016 6:02:41 AM PST by Prolixus

The Massachusetts Secretary of State sent a gentle reminder to Hillary Clinton’s camp today — neither former President Bill Clinton, nor anyone else, can campaign at the polls today.

“We received some complaints that he was campaigning, and the office reminded the campaign that state law prohibits campaigning within 150 feet of a polling place,” said Brian McNiff, spokesman for Secretary of the Commonwealth, William F. Galvin.

The former president was on the road today in the Bay State, shaking hands at polls at several stops. However, no evidence was presented that he was actively campaigning at the polls, and just being there isn’t enough to run afoul of Massachusetts’ election laws.

“Going into a polling place to shake hands, that’s not considered campaigning,” McNiff said. “There was a big crowd around when he did come, and I think people were upset at that. But campaigning is not simply being in the place.”

Bill Clinton was in West Roxbury, Newton and New Bedford today.

McNiff added that there have been no similar complaints levied against other campaigns.

One concern is that simply having the former president — husband of the Democratic frontrunner — on scene would be a de facto campaign sign, but McNiff said state law doesn’t get into those particulars.

“I don’t think that’s spelled out in the law,” he said. “People might have various opinions on that, but as long as he’s not campaigning and is just shaking hands like candidates do, it’s not a problem.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintons; criminals; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Bill Clinton was in Massachusetts breaking election laws yesterday. That, after weeks of a nauseating ad blitz from Hillary in the local media, demonstrates how desperate she was to win in MA. I don't know who voted for her (all the moonbats I know love Bernie) but somehow she won. Really, she should have lost the home state of Glen Doherty.
1 posted on 03/02/2016 6:02:41 AM PST by Prolixus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Rules are for other people, not Clintons.


2 posted on 03/02/2016 6:03:25 AM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Warnings for Demonicraps, jail for Republicans.


3 posted on 03/02/2016 6:05:16 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

So yet again the Clintons break the law and get away with it again and there are some on here , mind only a handful who say they will stay at home in a bay tantrum if their guy doe snot win , because the winner is no better than the Clintons.


4 posted on 03/02/2016 6:05:20 AM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Even they are subject to some rules like, “Don’t crap where you eat.” I think they did that in MA yesterday.


5 posted on 03/02/2016 6:08:19 AM PST by Prolixus (Proud to be on Hillary's "Enemies List")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

So, what difference at this point, does it make? Is he going to charge them with anything? I thought not


6 posted on 03/02/2016 6:08:40 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

It’s a dem thing I guess. We got a U.S. Rep. here in NE Fla. that hands out “quick pick” lists for election day.

http://www.corrineforcongress.com/quick-picks

Legal? I guess so. ethical? well......


7 posted on 03/02/2016 6:09:45 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Oh ok, Sorry! Like drunk drivers get a warning.


8 posted on 03/02/2016 6:12:07 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

These people are completely out of touch with reality.

Have they forgotten that laws do not apply to democrats - especially the Clintons and Obamas.


9 posted on 03/02/2016 6:12:16 AM PST by Iron Munro (Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth -- Mike Tyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

I’m St Johns county and how the hell is she still there when the elections swing to republicans?


10 posted on 03/02/2016 6:14:09 AM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

“Stumpy” Clinton can’t help it if she looks like a stump.


11 posted on 03/02/2016 6:14:50 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The Supreme Court is a joke being played on the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Of course, she’s “above the law” but I’m guessing a whole lot of Bernie supporters here in the Commonwealth are feeling pretty burned today. She may lose her base here.


12 posted on 03/02/2016 6:16:29 AM PST by Prolixus (Proud to be on Hillary's "Enemies List")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: manc

Redistricting is going to happen but not ‘till after the 2016 election cycle and also as I’m sure your already aware she’s fighting it tooth and nail (not unexpected).


13 posted on 03/02/2016 6:17:48 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Bill Galvin, democrat. Enough said.


14 posted on 03/02/2016 6:20:13 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

It is voter intimidation. Bill has a squad of secret service with him, and it would also be a disruption.

Dems also know bringing cameras (which will follow them) into a polling place will keep some people from voting (in my area that would be a big deal, as many like myself are coerced into registering as a dem, and cameras would make many union members like myself flee the scene).

Union bosses and party bosses often act as officials in our polling places which is bad enough. Imagine the Clintons being there as well.


15 posted on 03/02/2016 6:20:25 AM PST by Bubba Gump Shrimp (noob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Yea I knw and it doe snot surprise me at all. It seems every time the districts get drawn up again the Dems go to the court.
Hell the Dems though a small minority in my county still went to the DOJ a few years ago over school board re-districting.


16 posted on 03/02/2016 6:21:37 AM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Oh give Bill a break, he’s just out looking for some stray pune tang.


17 posted on 03/02/2016 6:21:43 AM PST by ImNotLying (The Constitution is an instrument for the people to restrain the government...Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Rules and laws don’t apply to democrats.


18 posted on 03/02/2016 6:28:04 AM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Silly official! I am Clin-Ton! Your rules do not apply to me!


19 posted on 03/02/2016 6:28:45 AM PST by Cyberman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

The Toon going into a polling place to shake hands, maybe not on its own. But his security detail shutting down the polling place, now that HAS to be a violation. Stipulate he must go by himself and see if he still wants to get close to the adoring masses.


20 posted on 03/02/2016 6:29:16 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Buchanan: A note of caution: This establishment is not going quietly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson