Posted on 02/28/2016 7:10:07 AM PST by rktman
Dozens of police officers in riot gear faced off against an angry crowd in downtown Salt Lake City late Saturday night, after police shot a black teenager who was attacking a man with a broomstick near a homeless shelter.
Two police officers who were in the area covering another call responded to the report of an assault, and ended up shooting the assault suspect four times.
A witness who was a friend of the teen who was shot claimed that the police opened fire without giving sufficient warning. In a report in the Salt Lake City Tribune, Selam Mohammad said:
...the victim and a man were in a confrontation, and the victim was holding part of a broomstick at his side when officers ran up.
"They told him to put it down, once," Mohammad said, and "started shooting him as soon as he turned around."
Mohammad said that the teenager was hit in the chest and stomach.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I think I see the problem.
Selam Mohammed? Hmmmm.....
I didn’t think that Utah could put that many blacks together in one place, frankly. Must have changed since I was there last.
“A witness who was a friend of the teen who was shot claimed that the police opened fire without giving sufficient warning.”
Yeah, ok.
Did the little jackass say anything to his “friend” that was beating the homeless guy?
How did he survive? Salt Lake City needs to issue 45s to its cops.
Stopped when I read the name.
When does a Muslim not lie?
Slime.
Pure slime.
Mohammed said the police didn’t give sufficient to warning. The police don’t have to give warning if they feel doing so would place themselves or others in jeopardy. If the yute was beating a person unable to make any defense than any subsequent strikes with a weapon could be fatal. Garner v. Tennessee criteria met.
The part of their religion legitimizing lying to infidels or for the purpose of advancing islam goes a long way towards making them sociopaths, doesn't it?
“Of course the facts won’t matter in any case. “
—
Of course not.
We have allowed ourselves to be ruled by 15% of the American population.
What they say is the only “truth” these days.
.
Scurrilous Commentary by Fred Reed
"It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity,
should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can't do. Their power seems without limit."
"Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations
for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where
departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged
not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks."
"Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple voting? The laws must go. Do blacks not like Confederate flags? Adieu, flags.
Does Huckleberry Finn go down the Mississippi with the Nigger Jim, or Conrad write The Nigger of the Narcissus? These must be banned or expurgated to please blacks who havent read them or, usually, heard of them. Do we want to prevent people coming from regions infested with Ebola from entering the United States?
We cannot. It would offend blacks."
"We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them, as virtually everything does. It is positively astonishing. One expects the rich and smart to have
disproportionate power.
But America is dominated from the slums."
READ MORE HERE:
http://www.fredoneverything.net/BlackPower.shtml
“without giving sufficient warning”
What part of “you are beating another man with a broomstick” does one not understand is deadly force warranting use of deadly force to stop? Why must this be explained as “warning”?
“I didnt think that Utah could put that many blacks together in one place, frankly. Must have changed since I was there last.”
was the mayor of Salt Lake City a lesbian the last time you were there? the whole county has been in a serious tailspin for at least the last 25 years. but let’s not discuss that in polite company.
AA was never intended for this!
It was years and years ago, actually. And, no, no lesbian mayor. I guess we really have been inundated and invaded. Sad.
Hillary will have the mother at her next town hall.
Lawlessness pervades from the very top the very bottom in this country.
Pendulum swings both ways.
Just sayin’...
It’s why I chose 15 years ago to vacate myself from anywhere remotely connected with a rail line, interstate, or a bus line. Best decision I ever made.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.